The evidence for the claim that campaign money buys influence and elected officials ignore voters to please donors is tenuous.
<h3>What is a tenuous claim?</h3>
This is the type of claim that people make that cannot be said to be strong, definite of have been made sure of. People just make these types of claims based on the things that they think even though it may not exactly be true.
The claim that campaign money buys influence is tenuous based on the fact that the claim has not being tested to be true. It was just made by the people without any concrete information that would serve as pointers for the reason for such a speech.
Read more on claim here: brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
I would have taken the same approach as the Nuremberg prosecutors because the Nazi leaders committed a crime against humanity through the Holocaust.
<h3>What was the Holocaust?</h3>
The Nazi Party in Germany decided on the Final Solution to the Jewish question by committing genocide.
During the Holocaust, more than 6 million European Jews were massacred in concentration camps and through gas chambers.
The crime of systematically cleansing an ethnic group is a crime against humanity.
Thus, I would have taken the same approach as the Nuremberg prosecutors because the Nazi leaders committed a crime against humanity through the Holocaust.
Learn more about the Holocaust at brainly.com/question/12962
#SPJ1
Psychosocial development during adolescence is often seen as a quest to answer the question: C, "who am I"
Answer:
Its C, because the citizens of that particular utopia become very lenient and compliant.
May I please have Brainliest?
Stay safe and healthy!
The answer is: B. Goods and Services
Factor of production refers to the resources that can be utilized to create the goods and services. (such as land, workers, capital injection, entrepreneurial skills, etc)
This mean that the goods and services are the end goal of acquiring the factors of production, they are not considered to be a part of it.
