Answer:
The correct answer for:
Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.
Is:
Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, it has already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands
Explanation:To understand this question we need to re-write it, re-structure it, and analyze it.
First of all, because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that...is already wrong. So we have to correct it:
Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they...
We require to correct it because in this case, we are talking about a phenomenon. Not about the group of claims made over large sea areas.
Thus, we replace it with: "it has already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands." Because again we are talking about the phenomenon/event. Not the talks.
After our editing, the phrase conserves its message and also is specific. Unlike the initial phrase. Therefore the restructure is the correct answer.
Idiot = espèce d'imbécile
Answer:
The correct response is Option D. A poor mentoring relationship will likely result if a mentor recruits trainees merely for the mentor's own career advancement.
Explanation:
Being a mentor is a huge responsibility. It helps if the mentor and the trainee share interests and that the mentor himself or herself is ethical and takes some responsibility for the trainee or advisee. Expectations for work should be clear and there should be a mutual interest in the kind of research or experimentation that will be carried out. It reflects badly on the professor if they are only hiring research assistants in order to advance their own product ideas and research findings.
Answer:
a. Long Cycle Theory
Explanation:
In international relations theory, the Long Cycle Theory was first presented by George Modelski in his book <em>Long Cycles in World Politics</em> (1987). Modelski claims that <u>the US replacing Britain as the leader of the International System after World War II is part of a cycle in international relations where one hegemon is gradually replaced by another over a period of roughly a century</u>.
The transition from one hegemonic power to another leads to the new world power carrying on the costs associated with such a position. And unlike defenders of the realist school of international relations, Modelski doesn't see this cycle as produced by the anarchy of the internationals system, but rather as a natural consequence of economic and political developments, including wars. According to him, Portugal was the world hegemon in the 16th century, Netherlands in the 17th century, Britain stretched his period of international dominance over the 18th and 19th century, and since the 20th century, the United States is the world's dominant hegemon.
