Answer:
Explanation:
comply with rules, standards, or laws. (of a person) behave according to socially acceptable conventions or standards.
It's like doing something because you friend likes it even though you hate it like if you hate strawberries but you eat them anyway because everyone else likes them
Answer:
All of them
Explanation:
The king condemning his own peaceful actions to be the cause of violence is in complete contradiction to one another. An oddity occurs and the action is in complete contrast to the outcome. One cannot justify that the corresponding actions may have led to the specific outcome. such is also the case in the example:
a; condemning a robbed man for having too much money does in no way justifies the action of robbing. Blaming a source that was done only for the reason of ones own satisfaction.
b; condemning Socrates for his truth to force people to make him drink the hemlock, is as absurd as the above example.
c; condemning Jesus for his devotion to God shows that the intention of the action was completely different but the outcome was in complete contrast.
Answer:
In this statements to understand personality, Calvin uses the cognitive-behavioral approach and Hobbes uses the trait approach.
Explanation:
Cognitive-behavioral approach focuses on contextual, environmental, and situational determinants of behavior, thought, and feeling, deemphasizing within-person dispositions in favor of external explanations. The cognitive-behavioral approach considers behaviors to be learned in various ways. Through one's own experience, the observation of others, processes of classical or operant conditioning, language
The trait approach focuses on relatively enduring dispositions that reside within a person. Traits are almost always defined as dimensions on which every person can be compared with other people. The trait position has also put conceptual and empirical emphasis on demonstrating the stability.
