Answer:
B. Employers are not liable for the acts of their supervisors, regardless of whether the employer is aware of the sexual harassment act.
Explanation:
In this case, the Supreme Court mentioned that an employer isat risk. That means that the empolyer does nor have a defense when sexual harassment by a supervisor involves a tangible employment action. Courts hope that employers educate supervisors so they do not commit any type of behavior that could be considered as sexual harassment. Also, all employees must be educated so as to understand their rights and responsibilities .
Answer:
A demurrer.
Explanation:
Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation. Therefore, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.
A pleading filed by one party to dismiss the other party's pleading for failing to state a cause of action is known as a demurrer.
This ultimately implies that, a demurrer is a pleading written by the defendant as a response to a court proceeding in which he or she acknowledges that the allegations in a complaint might be true and factual but it is insufficient to justify or establish a valid legal action.
For example, a party might file for a demurrer if a complaint infringes his or her right to freedom of speech and expression enshrined in the Constitution.
Answer:
true, i think
Explanation:
In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.
Answer:
The answer is c "It is a crime even if the extortion message is sent either unwillingly or without the knowledge of the sender."
Explanation:
Extortion, in most countries, means obtaining something by coercion or threat. Thus, if a message is sent through a mobile phone of someone with the person's knowledge or not, then an act of extortion may have been established. The onus is on the owner of the phone to prove innocence of sending such message in the first place while he may be charged with extortion as the case is established.
