The correct answer is good; deal with others
Explanation: People who are in a good mood or at a good time can deal with people because it becomes simpler when they do not have major problems, this makes it possible to have a greater possibility of empathy with each other.
Answer:
is this a question of a statement
Explanation:
The invent of strong federal government started with the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.
<h3>What is a
strong federal government?</h3>
A strong federal government refers to a form of government that prioritize a stronger central government against the a weak central government practiced under the Confederacy.
Some advantage of stronger central government includes:
- national interest overrides the local needs of the states
- increase competition between different state and local governments
- effectiveness of policies.
Some disadvantage of stronger central government includes:
- economic disparities across states
- state competing to attract business by lowering taxes and regulations etc
Read more about strong federal government
<em>brainly.com/question/846596</em>
There is considerable confusion regarding the ethical appropriateness of using incentives in research with human subjects. Previous work on determining whether incentives are unethical considers them as a form of undue influence or coercive offer. We understand the ethical issue of undue influence as an issue, not of coercion, but of corruption of judgment. By doing so we find that, for the most part, the use of incentives to recruit and retain research subjects is innocuous. But there are some instances where it is not. Specifically, incentives become problematic when conjoined with the following factors, singly or in combination with one another: where the subject is in a dependency relationship with the researcher, where the risks are particularly high, where the research is degrading, where the participant will only consent if the incentive is relatively large because the participant's aversion to the study is strong, and where the aversion is a principled one. The factors we have identified and the kinds of judgments they require differ substantially from those considered crucial in most previous discussions of the ethics of employing incentives in research with human subjects.
