Answer:
D. The Nash equilibrium is for Firm 1 and Firm 2 each to produce 10.
Explanation:
Firm 2
10 units 20 units
10 units 30 / 50 /
Firm 1 30 35
20 units 40 / 20 /
60 20
(firm 1 /
firm 2)
Firm 1's dominant strategy would be to sell 10 units with an expected payoff outcome = 30 + 50 = 80
Firm 2's dominant strategy would be to sell 10 units with an expected payoff outcome = 30 + 60 = 90
Since both firms have the same dominant strategy (to produce 10 units), there is a Nash Equilibrium where both firms produce 10 units and each one earns 30.
Answer:
The expected cash collections of sales in October $91,00
Explanation:
It is assumed that the remaining Percentage of 15% (100%-50%-25%-8%-2%) is received Third month following sale.
Cash Schedule is attached with the answer in an MS Excel file, Please find it.
Answer:
The correct option will be option B.
Dr Accounts Receivable $100
Cr Service Revenue $100
Explanation:
The reason is that the service was delivered and the money was received at just after the service delivered (the same day). So there is no need to pass the entry which includes cash received against receivables because here the cash received is because we have delivered services no because of any amount receivable.
So the entry that must be passed:
Dr Cash $100
Cr Service Revenue $100
And what we have done is:
Dr Cash $100
Cr Accounts Receivables $100
The correct entry would be removal of the effect of decrease in receivable which must be increased and increase in revenue which has not been recognized.
So the entry is that will correct the books of accounts will be:
Dr Accounts Receivables $100
Cr Service Revenue $100
Answer:
$16,400
Explanation:
Depreciation for 2020 is calculated as;
= (Cost - Nill value) × 50% × 6/12[July to December)
Given that ;
Cost = $65,600
Depreciation = ($65,600 - 0) × 0.5 × 6/12
Depreciation = $16,400
Therefore, depreciation for 2020 is $16,400.
Answer:
D. Land and construction costs are comparatively less expensive in Russia than in Canada
Explanation:
Option D would favor Russia ahead of Canada because of the fact that manufacturing costs are cheaper and they have easier access to Capital. I came to this conclusion since it has been stated that land and construction costs are cheaper in Russia.
In Economics the goal of every firm is to minimize cost and to maximize profit. Option D is cost minimizing for cool cars if they want to duplicate their overall success.
