Answer:
$880.31
Explanation:
For computing the new price of the bond we need to apply the present value formula i.e to be shown in the attachment
Given that,
Assuming Future value = $1,000
Rate of interest = 8.6% ÷ 2 = 4.3%
NPER = 8 years × 2 =
PMT = $1,000 × 6.5% ÷ 2 = $32.5
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after applying the above formula, the present value is $880.31
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
The utility maximization point for a consumer is as follows:
It is given that,
price of Pepsi(x) = $1 per can
price of a hamburger(y) = $2
Marginal utility from Pepsi = 4
Marginal utility from hamburgers = 6
Hence,
4 > 3
Therefore, it can be seen that the consumer's utility is not maximized at this point.
Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods then as a result the utility obtained from the consumption goes on diminishing.
So, there is a need to increase the quantity of Pepsi consumed and reducing the quantity of hamburgers consumed.
Answer:
$50
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the cost of the next best option forgone when one alternative is chosen over other alternatives.
If I decide to go to the game, I forgot the opportunity of selling the ticket for $50 which is the next best use of the ticket.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
The correct answer is B.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The current price of a market basket of goods is $2,500 and the base year price of the same market basket is $2,000.
To calculate the price index we need to make a simple division:
Price index= P1/P0
PI= 2,500/2,000= 1.25*100= 125%
The scenario you described suggests that the Law of Demand is correct.
Increase in price will always lead to loss of demand, while replacements for that product will grow in demand.