1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GalinKa [24]
3 years ago
11

Federal legislation prohibiting age discrimination against younger workers in the U.S. a.was effective in 1967 with other age di

scrimination legislation. b.There is no federal legislation prohibiting discrimination against younger workers. c.passed in January, 2010 and will be effective in January, 2012. d.became effective in January, 2007.
Law
1 answer:
mylen [45]3 years ago
6 0
The answer to this question is B
You might be interested in
Which of the following is an example of a delegated power?
Dahasolnce [82]
I mean establishing trials in court I believe is one and I also believe managing American territories is one as well, I’m sorry I couldn’t help more
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I’m sooooooooooooooooooooo confused
cluponka [151]

Answer:

Public morals

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This ones really confusing me whos more suspicions Steve or Alex from mine and craft
Fantom [35]
Steve ong no cap no kizzie
6 0
3 years ago
While the U.S. Constitution initially gave most of the responsibility for foreign affairs directly to the President, what is the
nexus9112 [7]
The answer is C (state)
5 0
2 years ago
The state trial court in nevada issued a decision in which a party was found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future
bija089 [108]

The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:

The state trial court in Nevada has issued a decision in which a party has been found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada courts will be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision.

Answer:

No, should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada state trial courts will not be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision, because the decisions of trial courts do not use precedents or rulings established in previous legal cases to arrive at decisions on future disputes involving different or entirely new parties.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the basic types of resources needed to produce goods and services?
    11·1 answer
  • The constitution reflects the principle separation of powers because it
    13·1 answer
  • Do you think defendants in George Floyd case should be tried together or separately and why
    13·1 answer
  • What can robots do that humans cannot do?
    6·2 answers
  • The burden of proof in a civil case is:
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an argument?
    8·1 answer
  • How are leaders chosen in a direct democracy?
    8·1 answer
  • They should make it legal to :) :
    11·1 answer
  • What are some risks of a case failing in court?
    14·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASE!!!
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!