1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xxMikexx [17]
2 years ago
8

If you were in a position to make changes to how crime is prevented in your community, which of the strategies in this lesson wo

uld be your top choice? Why did you choose this strategy over others? What difference do you think it could make? Why do you see this strategy as the most critical to undertake?
Law
1 answer:
Andrew [12]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

because it will be for the betterment of the community, also it would make a diffreence by enforcing public laws to govern the community or country

You might be interested in
Select the correct answer.
Marta_Voda [28]

Answer:

he must have commited murder

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
This ones really confusing me whos more suspicions Steve or Alex from mine and craft
Fantom [35]
Steve ong no cap no kizzie
6 0
2 years ago
What is the importance of studying criminology in the social science
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer: They conduct research, teach and work with different kinds of law enforcement agencies.

  They also study the social  and psychological factors that cause people to commit crimes  and research  which approaches to rehabilitation work and maybe do not work.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
State two reasons why reviewing past case decisions is important for learning business law
LenKa [72]

Answer:

it helps  because one understand how the decisions were made and the right it has to be used

7 0
2 years ago
Which two arguments support loose constructionism?
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.

Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.

7 1
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • To buy a house, Mary obtains a thirty-year mortgage with an interest rate that is fixed for three years and then adjusts annuall
    12·1 answer
  • Criminal liability consists of three elements. What is the correct ordering of these elements for the purposes of determining li
    11·1 answer
  • Elliot has misrepresented himself by acting in the capacity of a real estate salesperson without being licensed by the State of
    5·1 answer
  • What part of English government do you think
    13·1 answer
  • which supreme court procedure invovles justices discussing a case, debating it's key issues, and arriving at their own opinions
    8·1 answer
  • Discuss 10 responsibilities of a good Nigerian citizen​
    10·2 answers
  • Select the one statement that best defines the meaning of actual bodily harm in the offence under s47 Offences Against the Perso
    11·2 answers
  • Dn3rlwdnwqbfy3evfs deubfiwbfweviuebuevyibujbkhvyguhnjkbh
    12·2 answers
  • A bill about preserving the Red Fish in the Gulf of Mexico is brought to the floor and given a debate time of 60 minutes where e
    6·1 answer
  • 5. Is Carl Lee Hailey sane...or insane? After deciding, explain the reasons for your choice.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!