Answer:
The correct answer is: 1. Functional.
Explanation:
A functional strategy is one that requires the HOW? Do, operate, function, that is, after delimiting the corporate strategy that specifies what to do ?, the functional strategy, indicates how to apply and use resources to achieve what you want to achieve.
A functional area of the company adopts this type of strategy to achieve the objectives embodied in the strategy of the corporation, maximizing the resources available and their productivity. In addition, it seeks the care and development of functional and operational capacity in order to achieve a competitive advantage to the company.
These strategies generate a frame of reference used by the administration of operations and functions to support the organizational and business strategy.
Answer:
The seller may reject the offer and choose to provide a counteroffer.
Explanation:
In a free-market environment, a seller has the option to accept or decline an offer for what he is selling, in this case, a house. Furthermore, he can propose a counteroffer to see if the buyer is able and willing to pay more for that house. Taking this simple rules into account, the seller may reject Kelly’s offer if he wants and can choose to make a counteroffer.
Answer:
C)refusing to work until certain demands are met.
Explanation:
The idea behind a strike is to remind the employer or owner of the company that workers are a key part of the production. Strikes are an effective form of protest because they can paralyze a factory or a firm.
Strikes are usually more effective when the workers cannot be easily replaced by the employer.
Answer:
2.41%
Explanation:
The difference between the two firms' ROEs is shown below:-
Particulars Firm HD Firm LD
Assets $200 Debt ratio 50% Debt ratio 30%
EBIT $40 Interest rate 12% Interest rate 10%
Tax rate 35%
Debt $100 $60
Interest $12 $6
($100 × 12%) ($60 × 10%)
Taxable income $28 $36
($40- $12) ($40 - $6)
Net income $18.2 $22.1
$28 × (1 - 0.35) $36 × (1 - 0.35)
Equity $100 $140
($200 - $100) ($200 - $60)
ROE 18.2% 15.79%
($18.2 ÷ $100) ($22.1 ÷ $140)
Taxable income = EBIT - Interest
Net income = Income - Taxable income
Equity = Assets - Debt
ROE = Net income ÷ Equity
Difference in ROE = ROE Firm HD - ROE Firm LD
= 18.2% - 15.79%
= 2.41%
So, for computing the difference between the two firms' ROEs we simply deduct the ROE firm LD from ROE firm HD.
Answer:
The value of the intangible will remain at $350,000
Explanation:
The reason is that the International Accounting Standard IAS-36 says that once the impairment is recognized for the intangible assets it can not be reversed which means that the amount reported would be $350,000. The reason is that it is very rare that the asset gain its value and specially those which are intangible assets. Most of the management in the 1990s-2000 tried to recognize a gain on impairment which was unjustifiable to increase their profits for the period so the standard specifically didn't permitted gain on a previously impaired asset.
