Which two arguments support loose constructionism?

Law

1 answer:

Anastaziya [24]3 years ago

7 1

Answer:

Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.

Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.

Bug

2 years ago

SO whats the answer?

You might be interested in

A lawyer is suing a structural engineer on behalf of a client for $250,000 who’s garage slid off a hillside because of the struc

jeka94

Answer:

The types of damages that would be needed in order for them to be equally happy as they were before the garage fiasco are:

a) Compensatory damages

b) Consequential damages

Explanation:

a) Compensatory Damages are claims paid to directly to compensate the non-breaching party for the value of what was damaged, not done, or performed. For this purpose, compensatory damages will be equal to the cost of getting the garages fixed.

b) Consequential Damages address the costs incurred by the non-breaching party as a result of damages done to other facilities. Example, the sliding off of the garage could have led to flood water damaging some other property, which were not the direct subject of the claim.

8 0

3 years ago

Is red sus need help i saw him by vents should i call meeting????????? help asap please

Neko [114]

Answer:

Call a meeting.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If you notice clear fluid leaking from your

posledela