1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KIM [24]
2 years ago
13

Which two arguments support loose constructionism?

Law
1 answer:
Anastaziya [24]2 years ago
7 1

Answer:

Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.

Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.

Bug
2 years ago
SO whats the answer?
You might be interested in
What is the approximate time of death if the body temperature was 60.1°F?
Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:

43 Hours

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? When are there exceptio
sammy [17]

INTERESTS PROTECTED

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law. To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant's Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government. In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect's imminent escape. On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable. However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment. Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law. However, the protection under the Fourth Amendment can be waived if one voluntarily consents to or does not object to evidence collected during a warrantless search or seizure.

8 0
3 years ago
One of the most common research methods in criminology is what
sdas [7]

Answer:

The NCVS uses surveys to collect data and this is one of the more common research methods used in criminology. Surveys involve giving a questionnaire to a group of individuals or respondents. Surveys can be given face-to-face, mailed to the respondents, or given over the phone.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Write an essay
eimsori [14]
You know no one will do this for free here
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Private prisons are more economically efficient than government-run facilities.
muminat
False is your answer
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 1 and 2 1 and 2 1 and 2 1 and 2
    13·1 answer
  • 1. Why should persons accused of crimes be<br> informed of their rights when they are<br> arrested?
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP (Will Mark Brainliest)
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following best illustrates an application of Newton’s First Law (also called the Law of Inertia)? A A passenger not
    14·1 answer
  • Scenario
    14·1 answer
  • In order to identify hazards early and avoid last minute moves, you should scan the road _________ seconds ahead of your vehicle
    5·1 answer
  • Transparency and accountable is one of the principle of dimocratic system why
    12·1 answer
  • Why should the local government be
    12·1 answer
  • The State of California has decided to improve traffic safety. To do so, law makers look at a variety of options. These options
    7·1 answer
  • Hello! If a synovial ganglion (cyst) bursts due to a sudden movement or blow, does it reappear?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!