1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KIM [24]
2 years ago
13

Which two arguments support loose constructionism?

Law
1 answer:
Anastaziya [24]2 years ago
7 1

Answer:

Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.

Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.

Bug
2 years ago
SO whats the answer?
You might be interested in
specifies which people in a sport organization are required to report suspected child abuse to law enforcement.
vazorg [7]

Answer: any mandetory reporter can report about such cases. defintion of mandetory reporter includes following types of personnel.

1. any adult authorized by a national governing body or member of a governing body.

2. any amateur sports organization that participates in interstate.

3. international amateur athletic competition, to interact with a minor or amateur athlete at an amateur sports organization facility or at any event sanctioned by a national governing body.

4. a member of a national governing body, or such an amateur sports organization.

                                                                                ----US club soccer----                                                        

Explanation:

find out more on :

https://usclubsoccer.org/safesport/

3 0
2 years ago
Articles of confederation created a week central government which led to the creation of which document?
Sophie [7]

Answer:

the answer is C. the U.S Constitution

EX

The U.S constitution is not to be confused with The declaration of independence with separated the united state from great Britain. this document employs a new and strong central government

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are less than lethal weapons designed to do
viva [34]
Great can prevent and minimize the number of deaths, while still making sure the criminal doesn’t get away
7 0
2 years ago
What factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation?
devlian [24]

The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that

  • The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
  • The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
  • The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
  • The actions of defendant’s  led to a breach of the contract
  • The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
  • The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.

For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means

  • There are two types of tortious interference
  1. Tortious interference with contract
  2. Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
  • Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project

From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:

  • The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
  • The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
  • The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
  • The actions of defendant’s  led to a breach of the contract
  • The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
  • The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct

Learn more Tort interference from:

brainly.com/question/15058912

8 0
2 years ago
What gives district court the power to review and decide on cases first?
densk [106]
Ur answer is B…

Explanation:

Original Jurisdiction: the authority of a court to hear and decide a case in the first instance over the authority of other courts.
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Coroners, medical examiners, and forensic pathologists all _____.
    13·1 answer
  • As a result of the chestnut blight epidemic___________. 1. all of the others 2. the Plant Quarantine Act was passed 3. the peopl
    9·1 answer
  • Djdnxhrbjgenshsvdudvehdydbdhdudhbddhd
    9·2 answers
  • Why are wealthy people essential in the economy?
    13·2 answers
  • In the developing world, most women who achieve political office tend to have family ties to prominent
    6·1 answer
  • 3. Is freedom of speech even relevant in a functional society?
    15·1 answer
  • A non-custodial interrogation is not an option after the individual has
    6·1 answer
  • Identify two reasons why you agree or disagree with structural functionalism<br><br> -Sociology
    10·1 answer
  • What is the name of the u. S. Supreme court justice who was appointed to the bench in 1994 and who just announced his forthcomin
    11·1 answer
  • Help is appreciated!^ there is a photo attached
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!