1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
STALIN [3.7K]
3 years ago
13

An airline passenger is stuck in traffic on her way to the airport. Fearing that she'll miss her flight, it occurs to her that m

aybe if the airline got an anonymous threat of a bomb on the flight, that would delay the departure enough for her to catch the flight. What is her downside risk if she decides to make such a call?
Law
1 answer:
puteri [66]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

She may face between 7-20 years imprisonment and/or a also may be required to pay a huge fines.

Explanation:

Once an individual is found guilty of making a false statement which violates the federal statute, such person can face up to 5 years imprisonment and a huge fine of up to $250,000.

However, if this fine relates to terrorism as the case may be in the example, then the convicted felon faces up to 8 years and a maximum of 20 years in prison sentence. It may also include huge fines.

You might be interested in
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
26. Confidentiality may be waived if the information (1 point)
Elis [28]

Answer:

Could change the jurors' final verdict

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
So I currently work at a mcdonald's. I work part time and they say I am not allowed to call out nor have the weekend off. But I
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

well talk to them about it, explain the situation to the manager and demand an explaination back

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question got deleted, what is eminent domain?
Stella [2.4K]

Answer:

It has something to do with the goverment and housing, mostly like an housing agrent i am pretty sure

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
If you were a member of the Supreme Court what law would you rule as unconstitutional? What basis would you use to support your
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

Explanation:

The def: not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules. Ex." we cannot tolerate unconstitutional action" Declaring laws constitutional or un unconstitutional is done by the deciding in the Judicial Branch of government.

However, governments do not just create laws. Governments also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government—in the Constitution. In the United States, the failure to seat duly elected representatives of the people following a proper election, or the failure to provide for such elections would be unconstitutional even in the absence of any legislated laws whatsoever.

When the proper court determines that a legislative act (a law) conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This is called judicial review. The portion of the law declared void is considered struck down, or the entire statute is considered struck from the statute books.

Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court, or only by special Constitutional courts with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. This can occur either because the country has no codified constitution that laws must conform to (e.g., the United Kingdom and New Zealand) or because the constitution is codified but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it (e.g., the Netherlands and Switzerland).

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The philosophy of law, or the science and study of law, is known as what?
    14·2 answers
  • Cuales son las controversias, hechos, las pruebas, sentencias, los acusados y las victimas en el caso de Escobedo vs Illinois?
    6·1 answer
  • The penal code section for sex registration is
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true concerning criminal law and tort law
    8·1 answer
  • What is the 5th letter in sequence of A,C,E?
    15·1 answer
  • Brown v. Board, Main points, argument, and violations. I am expecting a decent paragraph! (10 Sentence!) Majority Opinion for th
    12·1 answer
  • Examine 6 regulatory and supervisory role the Bank of Ghana plays in ensuring that there is sanity in the financial sector of Gh
    13·1 answer
  • ¿ayudaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
    6·2 answers
  • Please help me to answer this​
    11·1 answer
  • ANSWER PLS
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!