<span>When the pizzeria makes 100 pizzas per day, it earns an economic incentive of 10% of sales from corporate. This is be cause corporate knows general advertising can only do so much. Local franchises need to take up some of the slack, post their own signs, and do some the legwork to get people in the door. If they can get at least 100 pizzas sold per day it's an obvious sign to corporate thay they must be putting in the extra effort. Extra effort means more money for corporate so they provide extra incentive to motivate the masses :)</span>
Answer: All economies
Explanation: The government of a country plays a role in every economy regardless of the type of economy the country runs, the major difference in economies is the extent to which the government functions in the economies.
In the socialist economy the government holds a more controlling role than in the capitalist economy where a free market is encouraged.
Answer:
$30,586
Explanation:
Using an annuity formula, we will compound at 2.9% for 9 years and the money at the end of year 9 will be used to compound at 2.3% for 12 years.
So compounding formula is:
Future Value = Present Value * (1+r)^n
For compounding at 2.9% for 9 years,
Future Value = $18,000 * (1+2.9%)^9 = $23,281
And now using the money at the end of year 9 to compound at 2.3% for 12 years:
Future Value = $23,281 * (1+2.3%)^9 = $30,586
Answer: 9.7%
Explanation:
Given Data
Rf = Risk free return = 6%,
Rpm = Risk premium = 4%,
Beta = 0.9
Wd = Debt = 20%
rd = cost of debt = 8%
We = equity = 80%
Re = Rf + Beta (Rpm)
= 0.06 +0.9 (0.04)
= 0.096 * 100
= 9.6%
Unlevered Equity Cost ;
ReU= Wd × rd + We × re
= 0.20 × 8% + 0.80 × 9.6%
= 9.28%
Levered Equity Cost:
New Debt = 60%,
New Equity = 40%,
New rd = 9%
ReL = ReU + (ReU - rd) (D ÷ E)
= 9.28% + (9.28% - 9%) (0.60 ÷ 0.40)
= 0.097 * 100
= 9.7%
Answer:
The answer is D. I, II, and III
Explanation:
As an investor buy a puts, he has the right to sell at exercised price stipulated in the put contract, which hedge the investor from the risk that the price in 6-month time will be going below the exercised price ( because he is able to sell the stock at exercised price through put option he holds). So, I is correct.
II. is correct because be writing a calls the investor has the obligation to sell at exercised price, given the market price fall below the exercised price in 6-month time, the call will not be exercise; however, he will be compensate by the premium from writing a call.
III. is correct because a short call will include holding the underlying asset, thus; once the major stock price decline happens, the profit from the strategy will be deducted due to decrease in underlying'asset price. Thus, in this situation, hedging with puts is probably better.