Answer:
1st is rational 2nd is irrational 3rd is irrational 4th is rational 5th is irrational
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
subtracting 289 from both sides, will make one side will be equal to zero.
thus we can then easily solve for b.
can this answer get the brainliest tag?
Answer:
Choices 1 and 4 are correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
We first need to find what the slope of the line is. That way, we can find out which possible answers are perpendicular to it:

Since we now have the slope, we need the negative reciprocal of it. Remember: if x is the slope, it's negative reciprocal will be
. Therefore, if the line's slope is 3, then we need to find answers with a slope of
.
The first answer is correct, as you have marked. The second answer, while written a little weirdly, does show the slope as 3, which we know as wrong. The third choice is not correct, however. This equation is written in point-slope form, where
. The only variable we have to worry about is m, which, in the third choice, is 3. The fourth answer is correct, which sounds weird at first. Let's put that equation into slope-intercept form:

Equations like these can be real sneaky, so it's important not to jump to conclusions with them.
Answer: |x − 82| = 3.2.
that is your answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
2 yards 5 inches will be equivalent to 77 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
Given length -
2 yards 5 inches
One yard has 36 inches
Two yards will have 2*36 = 72 inches
Thus, 2 yards 5 inches will sum up to 72 inches + 5 inches = 77 inches
Hence, 2 yards 5 inches will be equivalent to 77 inches