1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitry [639]
3 years ago
5

(6) Match the columns :

Law
1 answer:
rosijanka [135]3 years ago
6 0

2----------------------------------------1

You might be interested in
8.)
cluponka [151]

Answer:

Explanation:

8.)

In a personal injury trial, where the plaintiff alleges that because of the auto accident, she

is now suffering from extreme depression, the defense lawyer cross examines the plaintifr

regarding a prior treatment for depression, that was administered five years prior to the

accident. The plaintiff's attorney objects to any questions regarding the plaintiff's

past medical treatment for depression. What is the correct ruling re the prior treatment for

depression?

a) admissible in all personal injury actions

b) admissible due to the fact that he plaintiff has put her psychological condition at issue

c) inadmissible because of the doctor-patient privilege

d) inadmissible because it is irrelevant and prejudicial

9)

The necessary qualifications for a witness to testify as an expert witness are determined

by:

a) the Court (judge)

b) the Court and the prosecutor's office

c) the attorneys representing both parties with the Court approval

d) independent community agencies entrusted with such function

10.)

Which of the following correctly states the proper sequence of a criminal trial:

a) opening stmts./ motions in limine/ voir dire/ charge conf./ summations

b) motions in limine/ voir dire/ opening stmts./ people's case/defense case/ summations

c) motions in limine/ people's case/ charge conf./ voir dire/ defense case

d) people's case/defense case/voir dire/ charge conf./ summations

11.) According to the FRE, the testimony of an expert witness is

a) always admissible to assist the trier of fact

b) admissible if the expert's specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact

determining a fact in issue

c) inadmissible after the Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals case

d) inadmissiblebecause of the "Golden Rule"

12.)

In Frye v. United States, the Court held that expert testimony is admissible if

a) it meets the general acceptance requirement

b) it meets the totality of the circumstances test

c) it meets the FRE 403 balancing test

d) the expert is board certified in his/her field of expertise

8 0
2 years ago
Write a 3-5 sentence essay answering the following question.
Anika [276]

Answer:

Say you don't want to speak till you get a lawyer. That they are wrong you are gonna sue them for wrongful prosuction. Then when you get your lawyer state you alibia and how your not guilty.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did Wayne Williams say he was doing on the bridge?
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

heard a "big loud splash", suggesting that something had been thrown from the bridge into the river below. The first automobile to exit the bridge after the splash, at roughly 3 a.m., belonged to Williams. When stopped and questioned, he told police that he was on his way to check on an address in a neighboring town ahead of an audition the following morning with a young singer named Cheryl Johnson. However, both the phone number he gave police and Cheryl Johnson turned out to be fictitious.

Explanation:

hope this helped u !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List 3 of Preserve Evidence law
jonny [76]

Answer:

The evidence that must be preserved is limited to evidence that would be both material and exculpatory. Evidence is material if it is relevant to an important issue in the case, and evidence is exculpatory if it supports a defense or tends to show that the defendant is not guilty of the crime.

Explanation:

This might not answer your question, but this was from the wedsite below......

https://www.justia.com

8 0
3 years ago
32. If you take sedatives, you could experience_
e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

c. O blurred vision is the answer.

3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Which illustrates the proper outline for a judge's opinion on a case?
    11·1 answer
  • Roles john locke in devepment constitutional law
    13·2 answers
  • Cristina is packing up some evidence in a case she was working on. She got a strange request from the prosecutor: “Witness would
    11·1 answer
  • Gina is 15 and lives in Oklahoma with her parents and 2 siblings who are fiancially well and no abuse or problems whatsoever. Gi
    9·1 answer
  • The Aviation Security Improvement Act (ASIA) states that the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) can refuse to divulge informa
    7·1 answer
  • 1. Define and Explain Forensic Biology.
    6·1 answer
  • What are surveys used for in criminology?
    8·1 answer
  • If a person takes the 5th" and refuses to speak so as not to incriminate themselves, this is the 5th Amendment protection agains
    15·1 answer
  • What is the importance of different types of plans in police operation?​
    14·1 answer
  • Citizens would most likely state their views about issues affecting their community during
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!