Answer:
Conversion cost= $58,300
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Direct labor $ 29,000
Manufacturing overhead $ 29,300
<u>The conversion costs are the sum of the direct labor and manufacturing overhead:</u>
Conversion cost= direct labor + Manufacturing overhead
Conversion cost= 29,000 + 29,300
Conversion cost= $58,300
Answer:
A per se violation
Explanation:
A per se violation is one that violates antitrust laws for example agreements made that violates the Sherman antitrust act. It has adverse effects on the competitiveness of a market.
Sherman antitrust act of 1980 is aimed at regulating competitiveness in a market. It prohibits anticompetitive agreements, and unilateral activities that tries to monopolize a market.
In this scenario Omega corporation and precision products, inc., are the principal suppliers of their product in their market. They make an agreement that one will focus on retailers and the other on wholesalers.
This is an attempt to monopolize the market by the two principal suppliers, and is a violation of the Sherman antitrust act.
Answer:
Shoe leather costs
Explanation:
(A) Shoe leather costs
(B) Inflation can be defined as the persistent rise in the prices of goods and services. Shoe leather costs can be defined as the costs of time and effort that are encountered by individuals while trying to prevent the effect of inflation. It describes the costs incurred by individuals that visits the bank often inorder to withdraw money needed to purchase goods and services during the time of inflation.
Shoe leather cost arises during the period of high inflation, individuals do not hold large amount of cash because there will be a reduction in the value of the money.
Question Completion with Options:
a. Susan cannot deduct the $80,000 loss from the restaurant because she is not a material participant.
b. Susan can offset the $80,000 loss against the $150,000 of income from the retail store.
c. Susan will not be able to deduct any losses from the restaurant until she has been retired for at least three years.
d. Assuming Susan continues to hold the interest in the restaurant, she will always treat the losses as active.
Answer:
Susan
b. Susan can offset the $80,000 loss against the $150,000 of income from the retail store.
Explanation:
Susan can offset the $80,000 loss from the restaurant business against the income from the retail store because she has been an active and material participant in both businesses. For the past 20 years, she had participated materially in the restaurant, only just retiring this year. At least, she has passed the material participant test, number 5.
