1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erastovalidia [21]
3 years ago
11

Glen is a dairy farmer who owns 500 milk cows. His fences are in poor repair, and his cows are often found eating the grass on H

ank's land. Hank believes that Glen is responsible for damages to Hank's land on a theory of strict liability. The court will most likely find that Glen is:
Law
1 answer:
Trava [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I would say that Glen is responsible for all of the damages that are caused to Hank's land because the cows belong Glen and it is Glen's responsibility to fix things that are broken on his land so that way the animals don't escape. There fore I would say that Glen is responsible for the damages because he failed to keep his cows under control.  

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Explain a positive and negative of using the Presidential form of government And Explain a positive and a negative aspect to usi
Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

това испански ли е или какво?

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
3 years ago
In what way did larger states feel they were disadvantaged by the articles of confederation leading them to push for the constit
labwork [276]

Answer:

they wanted to be thier own country but america didn't let that happen

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Do you think physical evidence has increased in importance over the last several decades, with advancements in technology and te
neonofarm [45]

Answer:

yeah,, i think that physical evidence has increased

in importance over the last several , decades , with

advancements in technology and testing procedures because of new ways of analyzing evidence.

Explanation:

have a great day mate :)❤❤

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Standard Juvenile Court Act was originally issued in 1925, and revised in 1959?
DaniilM [7]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

There were six editions of the Standard Juvenile Court Act. It was then revised in 1959. Hope it helps!

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you find yourself boxed in by a vehicle on your left out right, ____ to clear space beside you
    5·1 answer
  • In 4/4 time what kind of note gets one beat
    8·2 answers
  • Ms. Lewis understands that Medicare prescription drug plans may use various methods to control the use of specific drugs. She ha
    9·2 answers
  • Who plays the lead role at the scene of an incident and is the first one to arrive on the scene?
    14·2 answers
  • Should hate speech be regulated? (in a essay)
    9·1 answer
  • 1. Which of the following is an act of road rage?
    5·2 answers
  • According to FBI statistics, what is TRUE about gender and crime?
    7·1 answer
  • What is the effective date of the new rules proposed by the cfpb to help with thetransition from libor?.
    6·1 answer
  • 2. Which leadership position in Congress has the most power?
    7·2 answers
  • The fact that there is a free exercise clause in the First amendment of the constitution illustrates that
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!