I believe the answer is: Evolutionary perspective
The evolutionary perspective view the pychological traits that human posessed as a result of continous process of adaptation that help humans to survive in our environment. According to this perspective The main function of the evolution of our psychology eventually is eventually to survive the natural selection and ensure our genes continues to the next generation.
<span>erik erikson(1902-1994), a german psychoanalyst developed an
eight stage theory to identify and psychosocial development. he was greatly
influenced by sigmund freud and his works. by the great works his mentor, he
explored three aspects of identity: the ego identity(self), personal identity
and social/cultural identity. according to his theory of development, every
person must pass through a series of 8 interrelated stages over the entire life
cycle. 1.infancy:birth-18 months old(basic trust vs mistrust). 2.toddler/early
childhood years:18 months to 3 years(autonomy vs shame). 3.preschooler:3-5
years old(initiative vs guilt). 4.school age child:6-12 years(industry vs
inferiority). 5.adolescent:12-18 years(identity vs role confusion). 6.young
adult:18-35 years(intimacy and solidarity vs isolation). 7.middle-aged
adult:35-55 or 65(generativity vs self absorption or stagnation). 8.late
adult:55 or 65-death(integrity vs despair). 2. toddler/early childhood years:
18 months to 3 years(autonomy vs shame):- this stage according to erikson,
occurs between the ages of 18 months to 3 years. at this stage, the child has
the opportunity to build self-esteem and autonomy as he/she learns new skills
for him/her self with pride rather than shame. also during time, defiance, temper,
tantrums and stubbornness may appear. children tend to be vulnerable during
this stage, sometimes feeling shame and low self-esteem during an inability to
learn certain new skills.</span>
I think it is the treaty of Velasco I'm sorry I don't really know if this is % correct
Answer:
C Inadmissible, because it is extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement on a collateral matter.
Explanation:
A defendant is on trial for robbing a liquor store. The store clerk testified that the defendant came into the store at about 11 p.m., pointed a black gun with a silver grip at him, and demanded that he give him all the money in the cash register. The clerk testified that the store was well lit and that the defendant was not wearing a mask. The defendant's attorney called the clerk's employer to testify that when the clerk gave her a report of the robbery, he told her that the defendant pointed a silver gun with a black grip at him.
How should the trial judge rule on the admissibility of this testimony?
The evidence should not be accepted by the Judge. if the the earlier statement is contrary, it is not a enough to dismiss the witness.(A) and (B) are incorrect because, The clerk may be reliable or not. The evidence she provided is not enough to prosecute the defendant. she might not be totally correct in the reporting of the situation and might leave the judge confused. (D) is not correct
A property insurance policy that is not subject to any coinsurance requirements but has a set amount of insurance scheduled for the property would use Stated amount as loss valuation method.
What is the stated amount in property insurance?
- With stated value insurance, the most that can be paid to the policyholder in the event of a covered loss is the sum that was "stated" by the insured (you) at the time the policy was bought.
- You and your carrier will decide on the maximum amount, or cap, that will be paid when you buy a stated value insurance policy.
- In the event of a total loss, the policy may pay the stated value, the actual cash value, or, if the car is repairable, the repair expenses.
Learn more about the Property insurance with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/6665628
#SPJ4