Answer:
C
Explanation:
Active voice has the impression of taking responsiblity, and therefore should be used the most.
The think RnB is a good tone of music for that subject
<h2><em>The lesson we learn from the poem the pobble who has no toes by Edward Lear is that we should take care of the important things in our lives
</em></h2><h2><em>
</em></h2><h2><em>
</em></h2><h2><em>
</em></h2><h2><em>Explanation:
</em></h2><h2><em>
</em></h2><h2><em>In the beginning, the poet introduces us to a young Pobble who is very proud of his toes His aunt Jobiska warns him that, pobbles often lose their toes by the time they mature. She tells him that his toes have a chance of salvation if he keeps his nose warm. The Pobble henceforth wears a red flannel scarf on his huge nose. He decided to go for a swim one day, his scarf is stolen by a dolphin before he swims to the opposite shore. When he gets out of the water, he discovers his toes have vanished. As the Pobble mourns his lost toes, he is flabbergasted and contemplates on which creature of the deep may have taken them: A crawfish? A shrimp? A mermaid?
</em></h2><h2><em>
</em></h2><h2><em>It's a story about ; properly taking care of one's things, learning to let go of things that are really not all that important, being obsessed with material things, accepting one's body image, about growing up and becoming an adult, the inevitable things that may happen, fear of loss.</em></h2><h2><em /></h2><h2><em /></h2><h2><em> HOPE IT HELPS (◕‿◕✿) </em></h2><h2><em> SMILE!!</em></h2>
<em>The Sports Gene </em>was written by David Epstein and published in 2013.
This book supports the idea that sports success has to do with both 'nature and nurture', that both genetics and training are highly influential, but also that each of them cannot bring what the other does.
The more a person practises, the better he/she will be. But up to a point. No one can achieve something that his/her body is not biologically or genetically prepared to do. This idea is in disagreement with other authors such as Anders Ericsson, who supported that training mattered more than innate talents and that could offset genetic inclinations.
