1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Solnce55 [7]
3 years ago
5

Did imperialism improve the lives of those who were colonized?

History
1 answer:
Stolb23 [73]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The correct answer is that in some ways it did, and in some other ways it did not.

Explanation:

For example, colonialism brought economic development to many colonies. In India, the British build a large railroad network that crosses the country, and that is still in used to this day. In Latin America, the Spanish founded many universities in each of their colonies, that continue to be important institutions of education and thought.

However, in many other ways, colonialism did not improve the lives of those colonized. Colonialism often brought war, violence, slaughter, and even genocide to the colonized populations. It also led to the destruction of many ethnic and domestic cultures and ways and thoughts.

So in conclusion, it depends on the country, the period, the aspect that is being treated, and the analysis that is made.

You might be interested in
Why are there more educational opportunities for young boys than for<br> young girls in Kenya?
Tems11 [23]
In Kenya, there are low levels of gender equality. Only 19% of the girls in the region are enrolled into schools. And In most cases for families, they send the boy to school and keep the girl home.
3 0
3 years ago
Please help ill give brainly and heart !!!
Rus_ich [418]
D) to spread democracy throughout the United States
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
San Francisco passed a law in ___ effectively outlawing cross dressing
pochemuha

Answer:

In 1863, San Francisco adopted a law that criminalized a person appearing in "dress not belonging to his or her sex"

5 0
2 years ago
How did the South's focus on cotton cultivation separate it from the North? How did cotton
s344n2d4d5 [400]
The south was mainly agricultural, cultivating cotton in some form was most people's entire livelihood, creating sort of a cultural divide from the north. plus, the menial and arduous labour in the south was incredibly appealing for slave owners, but this didn't happen in the north where factories and mills were everywhere and staffed by non enslaved people. cotton united the two by the south growing it and the north turning it into textiles and other finished products. together they had quite a good system since each part was able to specialize
4 0
3 years ago
How did the political boundaries of the U.S. change from 1845-1853?
sweet [91]
The political boundaries of the U.S changed from 1845 to 1853 by increasing the territory and getting land as far out as California because the Americans fought the Mexican American war (1846-1848) that resulted in Mexico yielding the area we know as the Mexican cession have a nice day (:
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did Axum's marketplace develop a blended culture?
    9·2 answers
  • The left side applies to Vietnam, the right side to Russia and/or China, and the middle to both or to other parts of the world.
    12·1 answer
  • What is the definition of a polity according to Aristotle?
    7·1 answer
  • How was ancient Mesopotamia’s economic system different from ancient Egypt’s economic system?
    5·2 answers
  • Why did the Romans purposefully make the consul position less powerful?
    14·1 answer
  • In 1872, Susan B. Anthony (1 point)
    9·2 answers
  • The United States has a central government in which power is divided among smaller self-governing political units. This is an ex
    6·1 answer
  • Based on your knowledge of world history, which of the following factors contributed most directly to the Mughal Empire’s territ
    12·1 answer
  • Who is popularly known as the father of economics​
    5·1 answer
  • If Adolf Hitler waited to Take out the British, than attack the soviets, would he have won?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!