If i understand your question properly, you want to determine how much each partner wiil have based on the sharing ratio.
Answer:
Alex- $40,000
Brad- $30,000
Carl- $30,000
Explanation:
For a net loss of $100,000 shared between partners in the ratio 4:3:3, the value of each partner's ratio can be calculated as seen below.
Step 1: Add the ratios
i.e; 4 + 3 + 3 = 10
Step 2: Calculate the value of each ratio in $100,000 using te formula
(ratio value ÷ total ratio) × $100,000
For Alex, we have
(4 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.4 × $100,000
= $40,000
For Brad, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
For Carl, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
N.B: To confirm if the value of each ratio is correct, you can add up the values to see if it makes $100,000. If it doesn't, then the calculatio is wrong.
Adding the value of the ratios, we have $40,000 + $30,000 + $30,000 = $100,000.
i hope this helps
Answer:
The double-exempt bond is the preferred investment because it has a higher after-tax return Tax benefit .
Explanation:
Calculatation of the after-tax return on both bonds
1)The double-exempt bond does not pay state or federal income taxes.
After-tax return =
Before-tax return = 4.9%
2)The tax-exempt bond is the state income taxes, but not federal in which the states can decide whether to tax their bonds or not.
Interest Income (100,000 * 5%) 5,000
Less: State taxes at 10% (5,000* 10%) (500)
Tax benefit from deduction of state taxes on federal return (500 * 35%) 175
After-tax Income 4,675
After-tax return = 4,675/100,000 = 4.675%
Therefore the double-exempt bond is the preferred investment because it has a higher after-tax return Tax benefit .
Hence the state income tax will be deductible on Juan’s federal tax return and Juan’s federal taxable income will be lower or lesser by $500 which will produces tax savings at his federal marginal tax rate of $500 * 35% = $175.
Answer:
The answer is: Following the expected value criterion the investor should choose indistinctively between the conservative or neutral alternatives.
Explanation:
The formula we use to calculate the expected return value of the different alternatives is:
ERV = ∑ (expected return x probability of occurrence)
The conservative alternative has an expected return value of of 4.5%
ERV Conservative = (6% x 25%) + (4% x 75%) = 4.5%
The neutral alternative also has an expected return value of of 4.5%
ERV Neutral = (12% x 25%) + (4% x 75%) = 4.5%
The aggressive alternative has an expected return value of of -1%
ERV Aggressive = (20% x 25%) + (-8% x 75%) = -1%
Answer:
Wants is less important because you don't need it/them to survive, you can live with only your needs, you should only get your wants only if you can afford it and still have enough money for needs.
Explanation:
I don't know if that made sense lol
The time value of money is the idea that an amount of money in the present is more valuable and is worth more than the amount of money in the future. Two things you'd need to consider when making this type of deal is putting yourself at risk of not getting the money and putting your trust into the person who owns you the money. You would need to consider that putting yourself in that position is your decision, no one elses. Ask yourself, "Can I trust this person?" or, "What if I don't get as much money as they promised?"
I hope this helps!
