The inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
<h3>What do you mean by inverse?</h3>
Inverse of the statement means that explain the condition in reverse way or vice versa.
Since, M is the midpoint of PQ, then PM is congruent to QM.
Proving in reverse way, let m be the point between P and Q the distance M from P is equal to the distance from M to Q. Which implies that M lies as the mid of the P and Q.
Thus, the inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
Learn more about inverse here:
brainly.com/question/5338106
#SPJ1
Answer:
84 degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
Angle A = 83 degrees
Angle B = x degrees
Angle C = 135 degrees
Angle CDE = 122 degrees
We know that the four inner corners of a quadrilateral should add up to 360 degrees. Two supplementary angles will add up to 180 degrees. Adjacent angles on a straight line will always be supplementary. Knowing this, just solve for <ADC and add that amount to <A and <C. Then, subtract that sum from 360 degrees.
<ADC = 180-122 = 58
58+83+135 = 276
360-276 = 84 degrees
Answer:
9
Step-by-step explanation:
10-2×3+5
10-6+5
4+5
9
Y= 2x-3 i think, but i may be wrong
Answer:
a. y < 5
b. y < 24
c. y > 3
d. y < 30
Step-by-step explanation:
a. 12y < 60
12y/12 < 60/12
y < 5
b. y/8 < 4
8/1 * y/8 < 4 * 8/1
y < 24
c. 3y > 9
3y/3 > 9/3
y > 3
d. y/5 < 6
5/1 * y/5 < 6*5
y < 30
