Answer:
The hypothesis test is right-tailed
Step-by-step explanation:
To identify a one tailed test, the claim in the case study tests for the either of the two options of greater or less than the mean value in the null hypothesis.
While for a two tailed test, the claim always test for both options: greater and less than the mean value.
Thus given this: H0:X=10.2, Ha:X>10.2, there is only the option of > in the alternative claim thus it is a one tailed hypothesis test and right tailed.
A test with the greater than option is right tailed while that with the less than option is left tailed.
Answer: The discounted price is $948. The value of the discount itself is $632.
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>To calculate discounts, you multiply the percentage of the discount as a decimal with the price of the product.
In this particular case:
0.40 [percentage of discount] x $1580 [original cost] = $632 (the amount of the discount) </h3><h3>$1580 - $632 = $698 [new price after discount is applied]</h3>
Perhaps you meant <span>(a^3+14a^2+33a-20) / (a+4), for division by (a+4).
Do you know synthetic division? If so, that'd be a great way to accomplish this division. Assume that (a+4) is a factor of </span>a^3+14a^2+33a-20; then assume that -4 is the corresponding root of a^3+14a^2+33a-20.
Perform synth. div. If there is no remainder, then you'll know that (a+4) is a factor and will also have the quoitient.
-4 / 1 14 33 -20
___ -4_-40 28___________
1 10 -7 8
Here the remainder is not zero; it's 8. However, we now know that the quotient is 1a^2 + 10a - 7 with a remainder of 8.
Answer:
6:8 and 9:12
Step-by-step explanation:
As long as you do the same thing to both parts of the ratio, it's the same ratio
Step-by-step explanation:
if a mat was 9800kr and the price was reduced by about 40% it would be 245 whereas another 60 would end up 980 itself so I'm not too sure as the cheapest alternative would be 40%
