The Supreme Court treat gerrymandering issues in 2019 as it allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar.
<h3>Is gerrymandering is a major problem in the United States? </h3>
The United States Supreme Court has declared in Millerv. Johnson( 1995) that ethnical gerrymandering is a violation of indigenous rights and upheld opinions against redistricting that's deliberately cooked grounded on race. still, the Supreme Court has plodded when prejudiced gerrymandering occurs.
It allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar. The manipulation may correspond of" cracking"( lacing the voting power of the opposing party's sympathizers across numerous sections) or" packing"( concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one quarter to reduce their voting power in other sections). Gerrymandering can also be used to cover incumbents.
Learn further about the Supreme court here: https//brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Answer:
Age requirements : they must be up to a particular age. They must be embers of my class and they must have spent a certain time in that class. They must be aware of the things that the class need.
Hope this helps and pls mark as brainliest :)
Answer:
The following clause states that "Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each state to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other state"
a. The Full Faith and Credit Clause
Explanation:
- The option a is correct as the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution states that each state should give full faith and credit to the public acts, records and judicial proceedings of any other state in the United State of America.
- The option b is incorrect as The Privileges and Immunities Clause provides safeguard against the discrimination for the people of a state in other state.
- The option c is incorrect as this clause is about commerce matters so it is irrelevant here.
- The option d is incorrect as this clause is related to the agreement between the parties so it is also irrelevant here.
- The option e is also incorrect as the this bill is about the rights of the public and many more so it is also irrelevant in the given situation.
Answer:
The Johnson-Reed Immigration Act , 1924
Explanation:
The Johnson-Reed Immigration Act was passed making it harder for some Europeans to immigrate to the US, and made somewhat easier for other countries to move the US
The Immigration Act of 1924, also called as the Johnson-Reed Act, was a law of the federal that was passed on May 16, 1924 in the USA intended to limit immigration of population in the US. It, the law banned entry of the entire Chinese population and put strict restrictions to other Asian immigrant groups, and to a fewer extent, on people from Eastern and Southern Europe; but it did not apply to persons from the American continent.
Answer:
in the photo there is courts name
