2. The whole Nazi environment probably aided to these Sonderkommandos becoming collaborators, from seeing everyone around you either fleed, killed or tortured is enough to make people to make choices like that. It was a live or die situation and under those circumstances, anything could happen.
3. Levi and Langer want us to see this situation from the Sonderkommandos point of view, where virtue and morality don't apply and the only choice is to kill/ follow the Nazi orders or be killed. They probably thought that by taking on this task there was a chance of survival.
4. The choices that we make help us to develope as person and in our personal identity, and in the absence of meaningful choices it can confuse us in our identities, and can lead us to make critical descisions.
Answer and Explanation:
Since your question does not present any options to choose from, I'll answer based on my knowledge of the story.
<u>In the short story "To Build a Fire", by Jack London, the immediate danger that concerns the man is freezing to death.</u> The character of the story has ignored a warning an old man gave him about roaming in the forest by himself when the cold weather is harsh. He chose to trust his abilities against nature, only to be humbled by it. The man did not have the knowledge, wisdom, and capacity to survive in the wild. The freezing temperatures were going to kill him if he didn't build a fire to keep himself warm. Even the dog that accompanies the man knew that, and couldn't seem to understand why the man wouldn't do it. However, when the man finally realized the urgent need for fire, he was not able to start one, and ended up dying. That is indeed a common theme in Jack London's work - the survival of the fittest. Had the man been smarter or stronger, he would have survived.
Who are you. Iambic pentameter is something you need to be able to clap to. Who *clap* are *clap* You *Clap*
