Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
There was a rivalry between the British<span> and </span>French colonists due to the disputes that developed over control over the fur trade, land,<span> and the over balance of power in Europe over the </span>colonies.
Their readers can refer to other articles, or it can back up proof that they aren’t committing plagiarism.
Answer:
The Haitian Revolution sought to end racial inequality, while the American Revolution permitted it to continue.
Explanation:
The Haitian Revolution sought to end racial inequality, while the American Revolution permitted it to continue describes a major diference between the American Revolution and the Habian Revolution.
