For each of the figures, write Absolute Value in the form |x-c|=d, where c and d are some numbers, to satisfy the solution set.
1 answer:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Attached number lines
Required
Express as:
The two points on the number line represent x and c (in no particular) respectively.
Solving (a):
Let:
So:
Solve the expression in the absolute bracket
Remove absolute bracket
So: the expression is;
Solving (b):
Let:
So:
Solve the expression in the absolute bracket
Remove absolute bracket
So: the expression is;
You might be interested in
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A study is conducted and the study by Consumer Reports showed that 64% of supermarket shoppers believe supermarket brands to be as good as national name brands.
a)
Thus; we formulate the null and the alternative hypotheses as follows:
The proportion is ; = 0.64
Null hypothesis:
The Null hypothesis states that there is no evidence that “the percentage of supermarket shoppers believes that the supermarket ketchup is good as the national brand ketchup differ form 64%”.
Alternative hypothesis:
The Alternative hypothesis states that there is evidence that “the percentage of supermarket shoppers believes that the supermarket ketchup is good as the national brand ketchup differ form 64%”.
b)
The proportion of the population = 0.64
The sample size n = 100
The number of shoppers = 52 stating that the supermarket brand was as good as the national brand
The sample proportion
The z - value is calculated by the formula:
z = -2.50
Since z = -2.50
the p-value = 2P(Z ≤ -2.50)
p-value = 2 × 0.0062
The p-value = 0.0124
c)
At significance level, ∝ = 0.05 ; The p-value = 0.0124
According to the rejection rule, if p-value is less than 0.05 then we will reject null hypothesis at ∝ = 0.05
Hence, the p-value =0.0124 < ∝ (=0.05)
According to the reject rule; reject null hypothesis.
Conclusion: There is no evidence at all that the percentage of supermarket shoppers believes that the supermarket ketchup is good as the national brand ketchup differ form 64%.
d) we know that the significance level of ∝ = 0.05
The value is obtained as:
Now; to determine Z ; we locate the probability value of 0.05 form the table of standard normal distribution. Then we proceed to the left until the first column is reached and the value is 1.90. Also , we move upward until we reach the top and the value is 0.06. Now; the intersection of the row and column results the area to the left of z
This implies that :
The critical value for left tail is -1.96 and the critical value for right tail is 1.96.
Conclusion:
The critical value is -1.96 and the value of test statistic is - 2.50. Here, we can see that the value of test statistic is lesser than the critical value. Hence, we can be concluded that there is evidence that reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, Yes, the national brand ketchup manufacturer is pleased with the conclusion.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
- 20 months
- $5500
Step-by-step explanation:
There are a couple of ways to work a problem like this. You have probably been taught to write equations for each of the payment amounts as a function of time, then equate those values to solve for the time that makes them equal.
at dealer 1, the total amount paid (y) will be a function of months (x):
y = 2500 +150x
at dealer 2, the corresponding equation is ...
y = 3000 +125x
These are equal when ...
y = y
2500 +150x = 3000 +125x
25x = 500 . . . . . . . . . subtract 125x +2500 from both sides
x = 500/25 = 20
The total paid will be the same after 20 months.
That amount is ...
y = 2500 +150(20) = 5500
$5500 will be paid to either dealer after 20 months.
__
The other way to work the problem is to "cut to the chase". The difference in down payment is made up at the rate of difference in monthly payments. So The number of monthly payments (x) required to equal the difference in down payments is ...
25x = 500 . . . . . . . . . you may recognize this equation from above
x = 500/25 = 20
