The answer is A because it shows the main idea there.
"In Flanders Fields" and "Dulce et Decorum Est!" both use the same event but they reveal completely different views of World War 1. In the first mentioned story author shows his respect to those who was fighting for their country and future generations, persuading the reader to feel the same and to be ready to protect their motherland. Author of the second story describes all the frightening moments of war and convinces the readers that it if they had to stand on the front line it would be the worst experience in their life. So, In Flanders Fields" eulogize war while "Dulce et Decorum Est!" warrns against it.
The correct answer is that it is a dependent clause.
A dependent clause, as the name itself says, depends on a larger clause in order to make sense. As you can see in the example above, that clause is incomplete - it needs to be part of a larger, independent clause in order to get a proper meaning. The other options are all complete sentences, which is something the example is definitely not.
Answer:
In the essay piece "Survivor's Guilt: The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt," published by author Nancy Sherman, she investigates the sentiments of guilt that servicemembers and women face after being exposed to traumatic events. They must survive an incidence in which they are deemed to be responsible for the death or injury of another person or group of people in order to be eligible for parole. Furthermore, they are haunted by feelings of guilt because of their incapacity to save them from themselves.
"Survivor guilt" is a negative emotion that emerges when a person has survived a difficult situation of any type, such as a natural disaster. In the aftermath of a sad occurrence, survivors may have overwhelming emotions of guilt that are difficult to manage. Soldiers' moral recovery is dependent on their capacity to forgive themselves and not be concerned with their own suffering, as described above.
According to the article "The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt," survivors may experience guilt even though they have done nothing wrong. This is since it happens much too often, and people who have done wrong should feel bad about themselves. When dealing with survivor guilt after a natural disaster or terrorist attack, there is a way to produce a solution that both people can agree on.
As evidence, below are a few notable points. Some examples include the following, all of which should be considered:
The fact that one has survived a natural disaster may make one feel guilty about his or her situation.
It is one way to share some of your bad luck: Sob uncontrollably in sorrow over your sins.
It is only through the mix of self-forgiveness and self-apathy that soldiers' morale may be restored.
Finding the perfect balance between a soldier's work and personal life might be difficult for him or her.
Explanation:
(305 words)
O% plagiarism in my answer. Please change words to make it your own work. :)
D. Marjane wants to be a prophet to fix the world's injustices
Please mark as brainliest
