1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bagirrra123 [75]
3 years ago
5

PLEASE HELP ME!!! I WILL MARK THE BRAINLIEST!! A given rational function has a quadratic numerator and a linear denominator. Whe

n the function is simplified, the denominator cancels out. The graph will look like:
a- a straight line with a hole
b- two branches with a vertical asymptote and a horizontal asymptote
c- two branches with a vertical asymptote, a horizontal asymptote and a hole
d- a straight line with no hole
Mathematics
2 answers:
finlep [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D A strait line with a hole because when you cancel you will leave a hole

Step-by-step explanation:

Blizzard [7]3 years ago
7 0

b

Graph the following:

y = (x^2 - x - 2) / (x - 2)

First I'll find any vertical asymptotes, by setting the denominator equal to zero and solving:

x – 2 = 0

x = 2

So I have a vertical asymptote

at x = 2.

I'll dash this in:

graph showing vertical asymptote

Advertisement

Looking at the degrees of the numerator and denominator, I see that the numerator is a quadratic while the denominator is linear. Since the degree is one greater in the numerator, I know that I will have a slant asymptote. But I need to do the long division to find out what the equation of the slant asymptote is going to be.

long division: (x^2 - x - 2) ÷ (x - 2) = x + 1

Hmm... The slant asymptote is clearly y = x + 1, but there is no remainder; the division came out evenly. That's because the numerator happens to factor as (x – 2)(x + 1), so the x – 2 factor divides out evenly and there is no remainder.

In any case, the slant (not horizontal) asymptote is at y = x + 1:

graph showing slant asymptote

Now I'll find the intercepts: Copyright © Elizabeth Stapel 2003-2011 All Rights Reserved

x = 0: y = (0 – 0 – 2)/(0 – 2) = 1

y = 0: 0 = (x2 – x – 2) / (x – 2)

0 = x2 – x – 2

0 = (x – 2)(x + 1)

x = 2, x = –1

I know that I can't have x = 2, as an x-intercept, because this is actually the vertical asymptote. So I'll ignore that "solution" of the above equation.

The intercepts then are

(0, 1) and (–1, 0):

graph showing intercepts

Now I'll plot a few more points. However, since this example is actually a special case of slant-asymptote problem (and something of a trick question), I'll also show you the points for the slant asymptote only.

x y = (x2 – x – 2)/(x – 2) y = x + 1

–6 y = (36 + 6 – 2)/(–6 – 2) = –5 y = –5

–5 y = (25 + 5 – 2)/(–5 – 2) = –4 y = –4

–4 y = (16 + 4 – 2)/(–4 – 2) = –3 y = –3

–3 y = (9 + 3 – 2)/(–3 – 2) = –2 y = –2

–2 y = (4 + 2 – 2)/(–2 – 2) = –1 y = –1

–1 y = (1 + 1 – 2)/(–1 – 2) = 0 y = 0

0 y = (0 – 0 – 2)/(0 – 2) = 1 y = 1

1 y = (1 – 1 – 2)/(1 – 2) = 2 y = 2

2 — y is not defined — y = 3

3 y = (9 – 3 – 2)/(3 – 2) = 4 y = 4

4 y = (16 – 4 – 2)/(4 – 2) = 5 y = 5

Do you see how that, except for the one point where the rational function isn't defined (at x = 2), the two lines are the same? In general, this is not true for rationals. But in this special case — where the long division works out with no remainder — you don't actually even need the asyptote lines dashed in. Instead, you find the slant asymptote equation (in this case, y = x + 1), and you draw that in for the rational graph.

The only difference between the slant asymptote of the rational function and the rational function itself is that the rational function isn't defined at x = 2. To account for this, I leave a nice big open circle at the point where x = 2, showing that I know that this point is not actually included on the graph, because of the zero in the denominator of the rational.

graph of y = (x^2 - x - 2) / (x - 2)

Warning: This graph is not the norm for rationals. But you should expect to encounter one like this, perhaps on the test. I've only ever seen this done with slant asymptotes, but it could be done with horizontal asymptotes, too. Keep in mind that you can't just "cancel off" duplicate factors when graphing rationals; you still need to account for all the zeroes of the denominator.

Note that your calculator will probably not show this hole in the graph, and "TRACE" will probably miss it too, since it is unlikely that x = 2 will be exactly on the pixel that the calculator is processing. But even if the graph does not show the gap in the line, the calculator will show no value for y when x is two.

When I asked my calculator to evaluate y for x = 2, I got this:

screen shot showing apparently connected line

If it just so happens that the vertical asymptote falls on a pixel (rather than between two pixels), then the gap in the graph will display on the calculator's pretty picture.

For instance, when I changed the window settings on my graphing calculator so the x-values ran from –7 to 7 (rather than the default –10 to 10), the gap was (just barely) visible:

screen shot showing gap in graph

When you do these graphs, get in the habit of working methodically through all the steps (vertical asymptote(s), horizontal or slant asymptote, intercept(s), plotted points, and graph), so you can do the graphing easily when you get to the test. And, as you can see above, you will need to know this material well enough that your calculator doesn't mess you up.

You might be interested in
What times 2 equels -108
Igoryamba
-54 i think is the answer 
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is y+1=5/6(x-2) in standard form?
vfiekz [6]
The standard form is 5x-6y=16
3 0
3 years ago
A recipe from Sally’s "Chocoholic’s Cookbook" requires 70\frac{1}{6} grams of chocolate for each chocolate fudge cake. How many
erik [133]

Answer:

842 grams

Step-by-step explanation:

70\frac{1}{6} =\frac{421}{6}

\frac{421}{6} *12\\\\842

One cake consists of 421/6 grams of chocolate.

Since Sally wants to give 1 cake to 12 friends, we multiply 421/6 and 12.

To make 12 cakes, she needs 842 grams of chocolate.

3 0
3 years ago
Let f(x)=cosx. Determine the x-value(s) where the function has a maximum or minimum value on [0,2π).
Ludmilka [50]

Answer:

can u say what subject is that

3 0
3 years ago
Negative solution for Multi-step equations
nydimaria [60]

Answer:

\frac{1}{2}(4x+6)+3x=7x+9

\frac{1}{2}(4x+8)+3x=7x+9

Step-by-step explanation:

By putting the numbers in the given equation,

\frac{1}{2}(4x+6)+3x=7x+9

2x + 3 + 3x = 7x + 9

5x + 3 = 7x + 9

(5x + 3) - 7x = (7x + 9) - 7x

(5x - 7x) + 3 = 9

-2x + 3 = 9

(-2x + 3) - 3 = 9 - 3

-2x = 6

-\frac{2x}{2}=\frac{6}{2}

-x = 3

x = -3

Therefore, our equation is correct which has a negative result.

In place of 6 if we use 8, value of x will be negative again.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Suppose that f(t) is continuous and twice-differentiable for t≥0. Further suppose f″(t)≥9 for all t≥0 and f(0)=f′(0)=0. Using th
    14·1 answer
  • And, S2
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a solution to the inequality below?
    13·2 answers
  • 18 feet + 120 inches = ________
    10·2 answers
  • This package of cheese costs $2.97. How much would a package with 18 slices cost at the same price per slice?
    11·1 answer
  • Someone help me with this please. I need help with this test sh*ttt
    15·2 answers
  • The last one under m<1+m<3 is m<5+M<6
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP WITH THIS MATH PROBLEM! :(
    8·1 answer
  • 2.
    15·1 answer
  • Write the equation of the parabola in vertex form.<br> vertex (2,4), point (3,-2)<br> f(x)=
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!