You must be dumb and have no friends
Answer:I feel bad for you
Answer:
PV= $40,279.36
Step-by-step explanation:
Giving the following information:
Number of periods= 8*12= 96 months
Interest rate= 0.039/12= 0.00325
Future value (PV)= $55,000
<u>To calculate the initial investment, we need to use the following formula:</u>
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
PV= 55,000 / (1.00325^96)
PV= $40,279.36
Answer:
196
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this, I broke it down into two parts.
A. Number of routes going to Town C
4 x 3 + 2 = 14
B. Number of routes going back to Town A
3 x 4 + 2 = 14
From here, it is easy to see what to do. Since there are 14 routes going to Town C and 14 routes going back, the answer is 14 x 14 = 196.
Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
We have events:
A - <span>customer orders a chicken sandwich
</span>B - <span>customer orders french fries
and probabilities:
so:
</span>
