Answer:
We cannot infer at the 10% significance level that the assumption of ski centers is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis for this question can be stated as
Null hypothesis H0: =4
Alternate hypothesis Ha:
The test is two tailed
Standard Deviation –
= 2
z=(4.84-4)/(2/sqrt(63))
=3.33
Z(0.1/2)=1.645 is less than Z =3.334
Hence, we will reject H0
Hence, the average growth skier ski’s four times a year is not true
The final balance is $580.81.
The total compound interest is $80.81.
There is a right triangle with the height (4) and half the base (3) as legs and the slant height (x) is the hypotenuse:
4² + 3²= x²
x² = 16+9
x =5 mm
Look 4x^2-16 is 0 because 4x^2 is 16 so 16 -16 is 0
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
y = (1/2)x - 5
<h3>
Step-by-step explanation:</h3>
Try the answers:
... -4 ≠ (1/2)·2 + 5
... -4 ≠ (1/2)·2 - 3
... -4 = (1/2)·2 - 5 . . . . . the third choice works
... -4 ≠ (1/2)·2 + 3
___
You can write the point-slope form equation and simplify.
... y -k = m(x -h) . . . . . . equation for line of slope m through point (h, k)
... y -(-4) = (1/2)(x -2) . . . filled in with your values, m=1/2, (h, k) = (2, -4)
... y = (1/2)x -1 -4 . . . . subtract 4, eliminate parentheses
... y = (1/2)x - 5 . . . . . simplified. (Matches the 3rd selection.)
