Answer:
Total E&P = $ 160000
Total voting Right Sold = 50/ (100+100) = 25%
Reduction of E& P due to exchange = Total E&P*Total voting Right Sold
Reduction of E& P due to exchange = 160000*25%
Reduction of E& P due to exchange = 40000
Reduction of E& P Lower of Total E&P*Total voting Right Sold or Amount realised
Reduction of E& P Lower of 40000 or (50*1000)
Reduction of E& P Lower of 40000 or 50000
Answer
A reduction of $40,000 in E&P because of the exchange.
Answer:
What you could tell him is that you can offer to help him review all the plans appeal process as well as to help him ask the plan to review his coverage decision which will enable him to know why he had large charges in excess of his maximum out-of-pocket limit.
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that when he received the bill, their was large charges in excess of his maximum out-of-pocket limit which is a limit on the amount of money a person or an individual have to pay for covered medical care services in which we were still told that the large charges in excess of his maximum out-of-pocket limit also include a number of services and items he thought would be fully covered, therefore since he called you to ask what he could do, What you could tell him is that you will offer to help him review all the plans appeal process and to as well help him to ask the plan to review the coverage decision which is why coverage decision is of benefit because it enables a person or an individual to makes decision about their benefits including the amount they have to pay for their medical services plan.
Answer:
Markets are competitive.
Explanation:
In the competitive market, the number of sellers competed with each other in terms of prices, quality, maximize the market share.
In the given situation, various sellers are competed with each other for meeting out the consumer demands also at the same time it offers the goods at lowest cost and highest quality so that it capture the whole market
Therefore the second option is correct
Question Completion with Options:
2.5 percentage points
1.5 percentage points
3.5 percentage points
6.5 percentage points
Answer:
Sandra's creditor must determine if the APR for the loan exceeds the average prime offer rate by:
1.5 percentage points
Explanation:
The first mortgage loan principal should not exceed the conforming loan limit for the area where Sandra lives at the time that she secures the loan approval. It behooves on Sandra’s creditor to determine if the annual percentage rate (APR) for the mortgage loan exceeds the average prime offer rate (or the sample rate that is a representative of the APRs charged by creditors for mortgage loans that have low-risk pricing characteristics) by 1.5 percentage points.
Intends to create opportunities for performance and communication improvement makes the most sense to me
