Obesity seems a severe problem for Native Americans, with their rates double the national average.
<h3>Obesity in Native America</h3>
- Only in the last two generations has obesity become a serious health issue among Native Americans, and it is thought that this is due to the relative quantity of high-fat foods and the quick transition from an active to a sedentary lifestyle.
- Recent years have seen the importance of nutrition and weight control in many Native American societies.
- American Indian and Alaska Native individuals had a 1.6 times higher likelihood of being obese than Caucasians, according to the Office of Minority Health at the Department of Health and Human Services.
- Furthermore, about 33% of all Native Americans are obese.
To learn more about Obesity refer to:
brainly.com/question/11366349
#SPJ4
Pros: emergency use, able to use calculator, notes, internet, etc.., and for socializing with people (can be both good and bad)
Cons: distractions, lost/stolen, could be used in a way to bully ppl buy recording or taking pics and posting them on social media
Answer:
Spanish.
Explanation:
My mother tongue is Spanish and the mantilla, the peineta and the gilet are the traditional dresses wearing in our family.- The mantilla is a traditional Spanish veil piece that is often worn during religious celebrations such as Spanish weddings etc. San Juan also known as Saint John's Day that occur every year on the eve of the 23rd of June, Spain celebrates the arrival of summer and the birth of St John the Baptist.
When used a wepion hope it helps you
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
