Yes, Like most strategic bombing during World War II, the aim of the air offensive against Japan was to destroy the enemy's war industries, kill or disable civilian employees of these industries, and undermine civilian morale. If a means is justified by an end, the use of the atomic bomb was justified for it brought Japan to her knees and ended the horrible war. If the war had gone longer, without the use of the atomic bomb, how many thousands and thousands of helpless men, women and children would have needlessly died and suffered ...?
Hope this helps ❤❤
Answer:
staffing, development, compensation, safety and health, and employee and labor relations.
The correct answers are treatment; depression levels.
Answer 1: The independent variable (IV) in this study is the treatment the clients receive; that is, whether or not they received <span>cognitive-behavioral treatment. An IV is an experimental variable in a study that is controlled and manipulated in order to measure its effects on dependent variables or outcomes.
Answer 2: </span>The dependent variable (DV) in this study is the clients' depression levels. DVs refer to outcome variables or results that are obtained as a result of manipulating an IV. In this instance, the manipulation of the IV (whether the participants received cognitive-behavioral treatment or were instead wait-listed) led to the DV- clients' depression levels. Specifically the researchers were investigating whether receiving the treatment had an influence on clients' depression levels.
Answer:
<u>Option-(D):</u> Immanuel Kant.
Explanation:
<u>The Philosophy of Kant:</u>
According to the Moral philosophy of Kant, the immoral actions are logically impossible when they are absolutely universal. As for Immanuel Kant it is not important that the people might be wrong or right in any sense or in relation to the universal laws and regulations, but they need more productivity, as all the focus lies on the results of the actions that are performed by any individual or entity. As Kant was an influential persuasion German philosopher and he had different concepts regarding the nature's existence. As for Kant nature was unknown to man, and there is no clear view of the nature's properties.
Answer:
<u>1) Why did the critics assign this derogatory term to Henri and his followers?</u>
Because the Ashcan School was creating an art form that portraits the day by day life of ordinary and humble people, and the detractors didn't believe that this was important. The term 'Ashcan' was often used, before the formation of this art movement, to describe art forms that were not understood or accepted by the audience. An ordinary art form.
<u>2) How was realism of this twentieth-century group different from realistic representation of the nineteenth-century?</u>
Because the members of the Ashcan School were focusing to portrait the urban life, while the 19th century realism wanted to do the opposite, choosing to paint the natural elements.
<u>3) Select a work of art by one of the followers of the Ashcan School and one of the nineteenth-century realistic paintings to illustrate your discussion.</u>
For this question, I think that the paintings you need to choose to ilustrate must contrast the ideas of these groups (Ashcan School and the traditional realism). Then, I believe that 'Hester Street' executed in 1905 by George Luks is a good choice, because it's portraits excacly what the Ashcan School wanted to do with art. On the other hand, 'The Cotton Pickers' (1876) or 'Long Branch, New Jersey' (1869), both executed by Winslow Homer, are a good counter argument.
Explanation:
