A dysphemism is a word that makes something sound worse than it really is.
<h3>
What is Dysphemism?</h3>
Dysphemism comes from the Greek meaning “miss” or “none” and “reputation” or “speech.” When someone, such as a writer, character, or a person in the real world, uses dysphemism, they substitute something inoffensive for something offensive. This is done in order to anger or insult someone, to show one’s irritation, prejudice, or in other more light-hearted cases, to simply tease or mock a friend.
There are varying levels of dysphemism and through its categories, some types are going to be more offensive to one person than another. It is subjective depending on who is speaking and who the term or phrase is aimed at. Sometimes authors use it to humiliate one character, to show concern for a character’s actions, or to disapprove of what a character has done. It can be used colloquially, in text, in speeches, and as the result of fear and prejudice.
Learn more about dysphemism on:
brainly.com/question/12985284
#SPJ4
I would change certain laws that I thought were incorrect or unfair (though I would have to get permission from Congress first). Also, I would look at the people (citizen's of the US)'s view on things and I would help everyone to be somewhat satisfied. It would take a lot of work, however.
Answer: Boycotts
Explanation: Boycotts can be defined as an expression of protest or disagreement acted by withdrawal and forbiddance.
In the given case, the gulf countries have restricted export of alcohol in their countries due to their perception that alcohol is not good for a healthy society.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that their forbiddance towards alcohol is an example of Boycotts.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there were no options attached, we can say the following.
This is an example of cultural appropriation.
What this businessman is doing is stereotyping Hispanic people that indeed they were like that, but 100 years ago. But bot today. Not even close.
It would be the exact same case if, in some South American country, a businessman would try to sell United States products, hiring a US citizen and making his wear clothes to look like Uncle Sam, and talking like Uncle Sam or wearing Quakers clothes and behave as colonists did during colonial America.