Can someone please answer this
1 answer:
You might be interested in
The first one can be done by Pythagoras theorem such as 
then 
then 
The second one can also done by Pythagoras theorem, note that this is isosceles triangle so
, again by using Pythagoras theorem 
then 
then 
For the last one can also done by property of 30-60-90 triangle.
The second one can also done by Pythagoras theorem, note that this is isosceles triangle so
For the last one can also done by property of 30-60-90 triangle.
The scatter graph of the data is shown in the first picture below
The 'line of best fit' shows a negative gradient
Part A: The most likely coefficient is -0.98.
If the coefficient is -1, then each point would be exactly on the straight line (which they are not as shown on the graph). The graph however still shows a strong negative coefficient. It can be seen from the close distance of each point from the line of best fit. So -0.5 and -0.02 is unlikely as they show weak negative correlation
Part B: Refer to the second picture to see the horizontal and vertical distance between day 15 and day 20
The horizontal distance is 5 units
The vertical distance is read between 61 and 71.5, hence it's 10.5
The slope = Vertical distance ÷ Horizontal Distance = 10.5÷5 = 2.1
The 'downhill' slope shows a negative gradient, hence the value of the slope is -2.1
The value of the slope shows that the surface area of the lake shrinks by 2.1 for every one day
Part C: The data in the table represents the relation between two variables. Since one variable doesn't cause the change in the other variable, the data table represents correlation rather than a causation.
The 'line of best fit' shows a negative gradient
Part A: The most likely coefficient is -0.98.
If the coefficient is -1, then each point would be exactly on the straight line (which they are not as shown on the graph). The graph however still shows a strong negative coefficient. It can be seen from the close distance of each point from the line of best fit. So -0.5 and -0.02 is unlikely as they show weak negative correlation
Part B: Refer to the second picture to see the horizontal and vertical distance between day 15 and day 20
The horizontal distance is 5 units
The vertical distance is read between 61 and 71.5, hence it's 10.5
The slope = Vertical distance ÷ Horizontal Distance = 10.5÷5 = 2.1
The 'downhill' slope shows a negative gradient, hence the value of the slope is -2.1
The value of the slope shows that the surface area of the lake shrinks by 2.1 for every one day
Part C: The data in the table represents the relation between two variables. Since one variable doesn't cause the change in the other variable, the data table represents correlation rather than a causation.