I believe it’s a, good luck:)
Industry would have unlimited ability to produce chemicals for use as pesticides, additives, etc without being required to measure their effects on people or their accumulation in water or soils and their impact on the environment, their toxicity, and potential exposure hazard
Waste water would be monitored, but there would be no limits or benchmarks for the levels of contaminants in the water
Automobile manufacturers would not be required to adhere to achieve a specific benchmark for noxious gas output, and cars would not be monitored for their output over time. It is debatable if gas mileage would be a consideration, as the only motivator for manufacturers to increase fuel economy would be the price of fuel and consumer willingness to bear the burden of fuel costs
Answer:
Neuroscience.
Explanation:
Neuroscience is a new approach in the psychology field which involves the study of the brain. This new field analyzes human behavior and mental processes that are intertwined with activity on the brain. This also turns to be the key interests for psychological study. Studying damaged brains is one of the most useful ways to increase our understanding of the links between the brain and behavior.
At the onset of a muscle contraction, the presence of calcium triggers the opening of the Na-K channels in the membrane. Potassium is a calcium inhibitor, so as the potassium flows out of the cell, it eventually reduces the presence of calcium. This causes the closure of the Na-K channel (negative feedback mechanism). In a hypokalemic state, the lack of sufficient K doesn't inhibit the calcium channel, and in turn doesn't properly terminate the muscle contraction at the cellular level.
Explanation:
no they don't In some people's minds there so fun and then in other people's minds they are A waste of time. A waste of time If you ask me there fun and some people have their opinions I don't think they deserve that better reputation though