The heliocentric model was generally rejected by the ancient philosophers for three main reasons:
1) If the Earth is rotating about its axis, and orbiting around the Sun, then the Earth must be in motion. However, we cannot ``feel'' this motion. Nor does this motion give rise to any obvious observational consequences. Hence, the Earth must be stationary.
—————————————
2) If the Earth is executing a circular orbit around the Sun then the positions of the stars should be slightly different when the Earth is on opposite sides of the Sun. This effect is known as parallax. Since no stellar parallax is observable (at least, with the naked eye), the Earth must be stationary. In order to appreciate the force of this argument, it is important to realize that ancient astronomers did not suppose the stars to be significantly further away from the Earth than the planets. The celestial sphere was assumed to lie just beyond the orbit of Saturn.
—————————————
3)The geocentric model is far more philosophically attractive than the heliocentric model, since in the former model the Earth occupies a privileged position in the Universe.
Answer:
El zoroastrismo, por el nombre de su fundador e iniciador, es la denominación de la religión que, derivada de una religión anterior denominada mazdeísmo (devoción a Ahura Mazda), se funda en las enseñanzas del profeta y reformador Zoroastro (Zarathustra), que reconocen como divinidad a Ahura Mazda, considerado por Zoroastro como el único creador increado de todo. El Supremo, y el Absoluto.
Explanation:
Answer
The result of "protecting national parks and forests" from "forest fires" is a healthier Ecosystem.
Forest fire is one of the big issues which leads to destroying the forest ecosystem.
Due to the forest, many wildlife and unique plants are affected, etc.
Amount of carbon dioxide in the environment increases which leads to climate change.
The vegetation of the region gets destroyed and the land becomes hydrophobic.
The natural water body also get affected by the forest fires.
hence, the correct answer will be option E
Yes, it is true that when conducting research, you should check <u>gathered information</u> against other sources to make sure it is credible.
<h3>How to check data credibility in research? </h3>
The researcher may assess the <u>data credibility</u> either primary or secondary by comparing it from different versions of <em>similar research. </em>They may also evaluate the final results in order to <u>estimate</u> their validity.
Therefore, it enables the researcher to establish trustworthiness related to the <em>findings </em>of the study.
Learn more about the research here:
brainly.com/question/7584488
Answer:
Gear a
Explanation:
Gears are pairs of rotating elements which transmit torque to the one another. Each gears have teeth on them and they mesh together to transfer rotary motion from one shaft to the the shaft. Gears can change the power, speed and the direction of power source.
In the context, it is given that gear a is the driving gear. If the gear a meshes with gear b, gear a will rotate gear b. Hence gear a is the driving gear and gear b is the driven gear. Thus gear b gets its motion from gear a.
Now if the teeth of gear b are sheared, then gear b will not be able to mesh with gear a and thus gear b ceases to stop its motion.
Thus gear a will turn.
