Evaluate the expression for d = 3. 2(d +8)= ??
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
- There is no significant evidence that p1 is different than p2 at 0.01 significance level.
- 99% confidence interval for p1-p2 is -0.171 ±0.237 that is (−0.408, 0.066)
Step-by-step explanation:
Let p1 be the proportion of the common attribute in population1
And p2 be the proportion of the same common attribute in population2
: p1-p2=0
: p1-p2≠0
Test statistic can be found using the equation:
where
- p1 is the sample proportion of the common attribute in population1 (
)
- p2 is the sample proportion of the common attribute in population2 (
)
- p is the pool proportion of p1 and p2 (
)
- n1 is the sample size of the people from population1 (30)
- n2 is the sample size of the people from population2 (1900)
Then ≈ 2.03
p-value of the test statistic is 0.042>0.01, therefore we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is no significant evidence that p1 is different than p2.
99% confidence interval estimate for p1-p2 can be calculated using the equation
p1-p2± where
- z is the z-statistic for the 99% confidence (2.58)
Thus 99% confidence interval is
0.533-0.704± ≈ -0.171 ±0.237 that is (−0.408, 0.066)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the system of equations:
We can convert this to a matrix. In order to convert a triple system of equations to matrix, we can use the following format:
Importantly, make sure the coefficients of each variable align vertically, and that each equation aligns horizontally.
In order to solve this matrix and the system, we will have to convert this to the reduced row-echelon form, namely:
Where the (x, y, z) is our solution set.
Reducing:
With our system, we will have the following matrix:
What we should begin by doing is too see how we can change each row to the reduced-form.
Notice that R₁ and R₂ are rather similar. In fact, we can cancel out the 1s in R₂. To do so, we can add R₂ to -2(R₁). This gives us:
Now, we can multiply R₂ by -1/5. This yields:
From here, we can eliminate the 3 in R₃ by adding it to -3(R₁). This yields:
We can eliminate the -5 in R₃ by adding 5(R₂). This yields:
We can now reduce R₃ by multiply it by -1/4:
Finally, we just have to reduce R₁. Let's eliminate the 2 first. We can do that by adding -2(R₂). So:
And finally, we can eliminate the second 1 by adding -(R₃):
Therefore, our solution set is
And we're done!