Answer:
A) it was engaged in foreign direct investment.
Explanation:
Foreign Direct Investment is a term used in business-related operations that describes a kind of investment made by an investor in a country other than the actual or original country of the investor. It can be either business operations or business assets in a different firm in another country.
Hence, in this case, when a Japanese automaker, built a factory in Ohio, it was engaged in foreign direct investment. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.
True total utility always decreases when marginal utility is present
Answer:
The answer is: 4) More frequently than not, the three objectives are compatible.
Explanation:
Toyota is famous for its Just in Time (JIT) management. They are the absolute kings of efficient supply chain management and they were able to do it by making the three objectives compatible. That doesn't mean that they all have to be dealt with at the same time and with the same intensity.
Toyota's first goal was to reduce costs and in order to reduce costs they had to increase their inventory turnover. Then they discovered that in order to keep increasing inventory turnover, they had to compress their cycle time. When they were able to compress their cycle time, their turnover increased even more and their costs were lowered. The system produces continuous feedback and their efficiency keeps increasing.
I once visited one of their factories that produces almost 500 pickup trucks per day and every single work station had available inventory for only 4 trucks; only 4 engines, 16 doors, etc. It is amazing how they do it considering that every 3 minutes one truck is fully produced.
The three objectives are not only compatible, but they are absolutely necessary for the SCM to be effective.
Answer:
equipment 3,700
Explanation:
First we calcualte the values of the machine given up:
<u>traded-out assets</u>
purchased 23000
depreciation <u>20,000 </u>
book value 3,000
fair value 5,000
gain on disposal 2,000
This gain would be recognzie if there was commercial substance. In this case we don't have commercial substance. So it is deffered.
Value given up forthe new equipment:
cash 700
traded-out <u>5,000 </u>
total value 5,700
We subtract the deffered gain on disposal to get the accounting value for the new equipment:
deferred gain (2,000)
accounting value 3,700
The machine will enter the accounting with 3,700
journal entry
equipment 3,700
acc del 20,000
equipment 23,000
cash 700
Answer:
The correct answers are: greater than; less than.
Explanation:
In the perfect competition model, the nature of the scale returns poses serious problems, whatever the case considered. Sise assumes that the returns of scale are increasing, the supply of companies is infinite; if they are constant, the offer is null, infinite or indeterminate (equilibrium case); if they are decreasing, the profit of the companies is strictly positive in the balance '. In the latter case, if they could do so, companies would be interested in dividing themselves, without any limit, into entities as small as possible.
