Answer:
That statement is true
Explanation:
Patriotism means that you will fully support every action and policies that will benefit your country the most. A large portion of people interpret patriotism as completely support ALL the decisions that the government has made. This misconception is created because many of them do not realize that the government often influenced by outsiders group that act without the interest of the nation in mind.
Answer: <em>Perseverance </em>
Explanation:
Principles of joint operations are known to be formed in association with the traditional basis of war. These three principles are restraint, perseverance, and legitimacy. These are majorly inclined to how the Forces of the US tend to utilize combat power over a range of operations. Here, perseverance refers to a principle of joint operation outlined to establish the obligation necessary to achieve end state of the the national strategic.
Answer:
C. A government that soon adopted communist reforms and ideals.
Explanation:
Take a look at Cuba and it's government today, how was it influenced? The Cuban Revolution influenced it with Fidel Castro's ideals of Communism.
Answer:
Leaders of the established 1966 military coup, including army officers Colonel E.K. Kotoka, Major A. A. Afrifa, Lieutenant General (retired) J. A. Ankrah, and Police Inspector General J.W.K. Harlley, justified their takeover by charging that the CPP administration was abusive and corrupt. They were equally disturbed by Kwame Nkrumah's aggressive involvement in African politics and by his belief that Ghanaian troops could be sent anywhere in Africa to fight so-called liberation wars, even though they never did so. Above all, they pointed to the absence of democratic practices in the nation—a situation they claimed had affected the morale of the armed forces. According to General Kotoka, the military coup of 1966 was a nationalist one because it liberated the nation from Nkrumah's dictatorship—a declaration that was supported by Alex Quaison Sackey, Nkrumah's former minister of foreign affairs.[1]
Despite the vast political changes that were brought about by the overthrow of Kwame Nkrumah, many problems remained. For example, the underlying ethnic and regional divisions within the society had to be addressed. The apparent spirit of national unity that seemed to have developed during the Nkrumah years turned out to have resulted in part from his coercive powers as well as from his charisma. As a consequence, successive new leaders faced the problem of forging disparate personal, ethnic, and sectional interests into a nation with shared identity and interests. The economic burdens, aggravated by what some[who?] described as past extravagance, crippled each future government's ability to foster the rapid development needed to satisfy even minimal popular demands for a better life. The fear of a resurgence of an overly strong central authority continued to dominate the constitutional agenda and to pervade the thinking of many educated, politically minded Ghanaians. Others, however, felt that a strong government was essential.[1]
A considerable portion of the population had become convinced that effective, honest government was incompatible with competitive political parties. Many Ghanaians remained committed to non-political leadership for the nation, even in the form of military rule. The problems of the Busia administration, the country's first elected government after Nkrumah's fall, illustrated the problems Ghana would continue to face.[1
<span>Some Americans support civil service reform because they feel that these offices need to be reformed and improved upon to avoid economic waste and corruption.
</span>
