Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
A 30-60-90 triangle is special because of the relationship of its sides. Also <span>It turns out that in a 30-60-90 triangle, you can find the measure of any of the three sides, simply by knowing the measure of at least one side in the triangle.
Hope this helps. :)</span>
Answer:
1335cm³
Step-by-step explanation:
The question above says that,Krispy kritters cereal used to come in a box with a volume of 2,850 cm3. However, the krispy kritters co. Designed a new larger box 22.5 cm wide, 6.2 cm deep, and 30 cm high and we are now asked to find "How many more cubic centimeters will the new box hold than the old box?
Now we are all aware that the volume of a cube or cuboid(since its a box ) is length multipled by width multiplied by the height.
And we were given the new dimensions which are;
12.5cm wide
6.2cm deep and
30cm high
Apply this given figures in the formula above and we have:
V = 12.5 × 6.2 × 30
= 4185cm³( this is the volume of the box)
Therefore,the difference in volume between the new box and the old box is
4185 - 2850 = 1335cm³
