Answer:
All the statements apply
Explanation:
1. Avoid mere mechanical descriptions.
This statement applies because it is an architectural proposal, thus, it should include aesthetic descriptions.
2. Emphasize the benefits to the recipient.
The proposal should include the ways CopperBuild would benefit the investors of the shopping center, from an architectural, and financial point of view.
3. Detail your expertise and accomplishments.
CopperBuild should add a few pages highlighting the firm's past experience, this in order to obtain more credibility.
4. Proposals are sales presentations.
This is a good analogy because what CopperBuild is doing by means of the proposal is selling "itself" (its experience, credibility, prestige) to the investors in order to get the contract.
Answer:
Option A. There exist economies of scope between diversified business units
Explanation:
The reason is that diversification is lowering the industry risk of the business the company is in by investing in several other industries. This helps us to lower the risk and have a steady returns in the subsequent years. This means uncertainty related to cash flows is lowered and this has also increased the chances of cash surplus for subsequent years.
Furthermore, if the investments made in diversified business units possesses economies of scope, which means that we are in related diversification because we are manufacturing different but similar goods which are substitutes to each other from large to some extent. This brings economies of scope and would lower the total operating cost of company. Hence the <u>Option A</u> which says that economies of scope does add value to the company is the right option.
Option B is not preferable option as the option of investing in different businesses is choosen in the option A.
Option C is again the same as Option B and the difference is that it uses the word several unrelated businesses instead of comprehensive business portfolio which is the same thing. Hence <u>Option C</u> is also not preferable option here.
<u>Option D</u> is incorrect because when we acquire an organization it is the move of increase in risk portfolio because acquisitions are mostly not a sound investments and not a part of diversification strategy as the company is putting all the eggs in the single basket.
Answer:
$3,460
Explanation:
Gross tax liability $2,120
Less non-refundable personal tax credit $2,880
Refundable personal tax credit $760
Hence:
Income taxes withheld $2,700+ $760
=$3,460
Luke’s non refundable personal credit reduces his gross tax to zero ($2120– 2,880) and $760of the unused credit expires unused.
The $1,740 unused business tax credit carries over and Luke receives a refund of $3,460($760 refundable credit + $2,700 taxes he paid)
Luke’s net tax due or refund is $3,460
Flesch Corporation produces and sells two products, in case if there is any shift in the sales from product Y45E to C90B, then the breakeven will also decrease, since the contribution margin for Product C90B is less than the Product Y45E.
Contribution Margin: Total Contribution ÷ Total Sales
Product C90B:
=(26100-9135) ÷ 26100
= 35%
Product Y45E:
= (33540-15093) ÷ 33540
= 45%
Since the contribution margin of Product C90B < Product Y45E, the breakeven will decrease.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Why do businesses take financial costs into account other than social costs when making decisions.?
The reason why is because businesses are created to make profits. And financial costs directly impact sales, revenue, and profits. Any other consideration that does not directly affect the balance sheet or the bottom line, is not considered a priority and takes the back seat when business decisions are made.
On the other hand, the social cost should be important and it is, but not as important as the financial costs for the above-mentioned reasons.
Social costs are more on the side of the ethics of the managers or leaders of the organizations. And ethics and moral values are not a prominent thing to be considered in the decision-making process of modern corporations.