1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BabaBlast [244]
3 years ago
10

Feelings can be hurt by mutually respecting coworkers. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F

Business
1 answer:
Blababa [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

A team can be defined as a group of people or set of individuals with various skill set, knowledge and experience coming together to work on a project or task in order to successfully achieve a set goal and objective.

This ultimately implies that, a team comprises of individuals, workers or employees having complementary skills, knowledge and experience needed to execute a project or task successfully. Therefore, workers working as a team usually interact with the other team members and as a result, this enhances performance and strengthen the level of relationship they share.

Basically, when coworkers or employees working in an organization have mutual respect for one another, it would help to tighten or strengthen the bond that exists in the workplace and as such improving their feelings for each other.

This ultimately implies that, feelings cannot be hurt by mutually respecting coworkers.

You might be interested in
Which term means the government isn't above the law?
Vadim26 [7]

Answer:

rule of law

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
The tragedy of the commons occurs because
kow [346]
<span>c. common resources are rival in consumption. In the tragedy of the commons, William Forster Lloyd presented the example of a common resource being over used and destroyed because for any individual abusing the resource, they gained a benefit while the damage to the resource was paid by everyone. So let's look at the available options and see what makes sense, or doesn't make sense. a. people consider the value of resources in the future more than in the present. * If this were true, the there wouldn't be a tragedy of the commons. So this is an incorrect answer. b. markets do not account for the presence of property rights. * The tragedy of the commons doesn't involve property rights. EVERYONE in the community is allowed to use the commons. The problem is irresponsible overuse of the common resource. So this is also an incorrect answer. c. common resources are rival in consumption. * This is the correct answer. The concept of Rivalry is where a common resource can not be simultaneous consumed by multiple users, or if the consumption of a resource decreases its utility to another consumer. In the tragedy, if one person grazes (consumes) more than their fair share, the commons gets over grazed and over time stops producing. Each person who's overgrazing does get a tangible short term benefit for doing so, but everyone has to pay the cost. d. government does not efficiently allocate society's scarce resources. * This is also a wrong answer. It's true that the commons could be regulated by the government, but then it would no longer be the commons.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
The owner of a bicycle repair shop forecasts revenues of $188,000 a year. Variable costs will be $57,000, and rental costs for t
Umnica [9.8K]

Answer:

Revenues=$188,000

Less: Variable Costs=$57,000

Less: Rentals=$37,000

Earnings before depreciation and tax=$94,000

Less: Depreciation =$17,000

Earnings before tax=$77,000

Less: Tax40%=$30,800

Net Income=$46,200

a) Dollars in minus dollars out

Dollars in = Revenues = $188,000

Dollars out = Variable cost + Rentals + Tax = $57,000 + $37,000 + $30,800 = $124,800

Operating cash flow = $188,000 - $124,800 = $63,200

b) Adjusted accounting profits

Operating cash flow = Net income + Depreciation = $46,200 + $17,000 = $63,200

c) Add back depreciation tax shield

Operating cash flow = Earnings before depreciation and tax x (1 - tax rate) + Depreciation tax shield

or, Operating cash flow = $94,000 x (1 - 0.40) + $17,000 x 40% = $63,200

Yes, all the results are same.

7 0
4 years ago
On January 1, 2014, Borstad Company purchased equipment for $1,180,000. It is depreciating the equipment over 25 years using the
lord [1]

Answer:

Explanation:

a)Purchase cost - 1,180,000

Useful life - 25

Annual depreciation = 47,200

Timeline - Jan 1 , 2014 - 2019 = 6 years

Accumulated depreciation = 47200*6=283,200

Carrying value at 2019 = (1,180,000 - 283,200)= 896,800

B) Annual cash flow - 400,000

Annual cash outflow - (295,000)

Net cash inflow= 105,000

Net cash flow for 8 years = 105000*8 = 840000

Since the net cash inflow is less than the carrying value , there is an impairment.

PV value of the net cash inflow at 12% discount for 8 years = 521,602

Impairment loss = $375,198    

At December 21.2019

2.) Debit impairment loss - $375,198

Credit equipment - $375,198        

               

4 0
4 years ago
Suppose Acap Corporation will pay a dividend of $2.88 per share at the end of this year and $3.01 per share next year. You expec
ruslelena [56]

Answer:

A.P(0)=$48.89

B.P(1)=$51.56

C.P(0)=$49.35

Explanation:

A. Calculation for what price would you be willing to pay for a share of Acap stock​ today if you planned to hold the stock for two year

Using this formula

P(0)=Dividend per share/Percentage of Equity cost of capital +(Dividend next year+Stock price)/Percentage of Equity cost of capital

Let plug in the formula

P(0) = 2.88/ 1.103 + (3.01+ 53.87) / 1.103^2=

P(0)=2.611+56.88/1.216609

P(0)=59.491/1.216609

P(0)=$48.89

b. Calculation for what price would you expect to be able to sell a share of Acap stock in one​ year

Using this formula

P(1)=(Dividend next year + Stock price)/Percentage of Equity cost of capital

Let plug in the formula

P(1) = (3.01 + 53.87) / 1.103 = $50.00

P(1)=56.88/1.103

P(1)=$51.56

c.Calculation for what price would you be willing to pay for a share of Acap stock today if you planned to hold the stock for one​ year

Using this formula

P(0)=(Dividend per share + P(1)/Percentage of Equity cost of capital

Let plug in the formula

P(0) = (2.88 + 51.56) / 1.103

P(0)=54.44/1.103

P(0)=$49.35

Therefore compare to the answer in ​(a​)

if you planned to hold the stock for two year you will have $48.89 and if you planned to hold the stock for one​ year you will have $49.35.

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • The adjusted trial balance for Marigold Corp. at the end of the current year, 2021, contained the following accounts. 5-year Bon
    13·1 answer
  • Consider three imaginary countries. In Aire, saving amounts to $4,000 and consumption amounts to $12,000; in Bovina, saving amou
    14·1 answer
  • International business differs from domestic business in that a firm operating across borders must deal with: Group of answer ch
    12·1 answer
  • Net income reported under absorption costing will exceed net income reported under direct costing for a given period if: Group o
    9·1 answer
  • James's partnership agreement with two other men was a bit unsound. One of the problems the men were encountering was uneven pro
    5·1 answer
  • whole number. a. Before the tax is imposed, the equilibrium price is $ 1.5 per bottle and the equilibrium quantity is 4 billion
    8·1 answer
  • Kemmen Foods, a company that manufactures and sells breakfast cereals, has customized its cereal flavors to suit different lifes
    10·2 answers
  • Service companies generally use a repetitive or intermittent production process rather than the continuous process. True False
    12·1 answer
  • Occasionally, _________________ may lead to pure monopoly; in other market conditions, they may limit competition ______________
    14·1 answer
  • The part of marketing copy that asks the audience to do something with the information you've just provided is known as what?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!