Answer:
A. annoying
Explanation:
Hoping i understood the question right i think it would be annoying, 3. It is hard for anyone to get along with my 'Ornery' sister. I think the highlighted word is the word we are trying to identify the meaning of, and Ornery means essentially annoying. Sorry if i'm wrong.
The first blank will be fill by non-declarative and second blank will be fill by declarative.
The psychological processes of gathering, saving, holding onto, and later recovering information are referred to as memory. Memory is primarily composed of three processes: encoding, storage, and retrieval. The capacity of human memory includes the capacity to store and retrieve data. This method is not perfect, though.
Non-declarative memory includes what people can do or demonstrate, whereas declarative memory is about what people know and can report.
Learn more about memory here brainly.com/question/25040884
#SPJ4
The correct answer is C) intermediate scrutiny test.
A law that placed restrictions on courses girls could take in high school would be evaluated by the courts using the intermediate scrutiny test.
We are talking about the kind of test the Court uses to determine the constitutionality of a statute. When the members of the Court need to make a decision, this test is a tool they have to help them decide if a statute passed by the federal government or a state affects in a negative way some protected classes such as the case of the courses girls could take in high school.
1. This is a matter of constitutional law, as the reporter is defending her rights as a citizen stated by the Constitution (in this case, her freedom of expression).
2. It is a combination. On the one hand, the case will involve studying the constitution, and what it has to say about the reporter's freedoms. On the other hand, it will require studying the statute that argues that news agencies cannot publish information that can threaten the nation. Finally, case law will likely be relevant if there is a similar precedent in the law.
3. The law that the federal government is presenting is intended to protect the citizen's from threatening information. On the other hand, the law that the reporter is referring to is intended to protect her freedom of expression.
4. If the law to protect citizen's from information did not exist, it could be an obstacle for the effective action of the government. It could also cause panic and animosity among the people. If the law the reporter is defending did not exist, the government would be able to control the press completely.
