<span>The closest to perfection would be an interdependent Confederation of societies, each containing between one and two hundred citizens, depending upon factors such as location and climate. These villages would be more or less evenly distributed across the globe, having access to roughly equivalent amounts of arable land. Thirty per cent of all land would be designated wilderness, and no societies would be allowed to colonise these areas, but antisocial individuals would be free to inhabit the wilderness following a life-style of total lonesomeness.</span>
Answer:
Relative deprivation theory
Explanation:
Relative deprivation theory is related to the lack of resources that are important for maintaining the basic life of a person, for example, bread and butter, clothes, etc. Many of the basic needs that not meet by an individual that is called deprivation. Relative deprivation theory is related to a person when feeling a lack or deprived of almost all things that are necessary for basic life.
Thus here in the above statement indicates that you believe in relative deprivation theory.
Answer:
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
Situation: Joe plays baseball, but has been on a bit of a slump, going 0 for 25 in his last at bats (zero hits for 25 chances). On Friday, Joe accidentally wore his socks inside out and hit two doubles and a homerun. Clearly, Joe thinks, it must be the socks. Joe wears them every game now. Question: What causal fallacy is this? post hoc fallacy.
It is a logical fallacy that follow that an event happens as a result of an event, the word is gotten from Latin which literally means "after this""therefore because of this"