<h2><em><u>Question:</u></em></h2>
<em>→</em><em>A Pattern Maker is involved in which industry? </em>
<h2><u><em>Choices</em><em>:</em></u></h2>
<em>A. The Farming </em><em>Industry</em>
<em>B. The Textiles </em><em>Industry</em>
<em>C. Garment and Apparel Production Industry..</em>
<em>D. Fashion Merchandising </em><em>Industry</em>
<em><u>E. Tools and Equipment Manufacturing and Industry.</u></em>
<h2><em><u>Answer:</u></em></h2>
- <em>E. <u>Tools and Equipment Manufacturing and Industry.</u></em>
<h2><em><u>Explanation:</u></em></h2>
<em>→</em><em>Patternmakers are a vital part of the fashion and manufacturing industries. In some companies, the job title for a patternmaker may be apparel patternmaker or fabric patternmaker. It is the job of the patternmaker to create a pattern either free-hand or with computer-aided drafting software.</em>
<em>#</em><em>C</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em>O</em><em>n</em><em>L</em><em>e</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>n</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>g</em>
Explanation:
Media and t.v stars are the role model of the public. The public has faith and belief in Movie and TV stars. When people watch violence on tv and videos, it affects them personally because their ideal star is performing that act. But this relation does not show that watching violence is related to aggressive behavior. OTV, video, and media play a role model for the public.
If the public watch violence on tv or media they get influenced more than directly watching aggression. This it is not necessary that watching violence influences the aggressive behavior of people because of media.
Well you can try purple.
Let's hope it works CX
Answer:
The FEC places limits on campaign contributions, PACS do not have contribution limits, and people can contribute no more than 2,700$
Explanation:
