Answer:
A. growth stocks and blue chip stocks immediately in the amount of $150,000 to obtain the necessary cash down payment
Explanation:
The customer wouldn't want to get the stock cashed out now, so he doesn't have to worry about the stock or market having a huge decline and so, he can't buy the house.
Answer:
The answer is Substitutes.
Explanation:
For cross-price elasticity we can either have substitute goods or compliment goods. If the cross-price elasticity is positive, then the goods are substitutes and If the cross-price elasticity is negative, then the goods are compliments.
In this example, the cross-price elasticity is 0.31. This answer is postive, meaning, beer and wine are substitutes.
So 1% increase in price of wine will make demand of beer to rise by 0.31.
It can't be complement s because it is not negative.
It can't be necessities because this does not relate to cross-price elasticity
Answer: $2,398.55
Explanation:
The deposit at the end of year one would have been compounded by 2 years at the end of year 3. The second year deposit would have compounded by 1 year and the third year deposit would not have compounded at all.
The future value at the end of 3 years is;
= (500 * ( 1 + 11%)²) + (750 * ( 1 + 11%)) + 950
= $2,398.55
<em>The question might not be the exact same but you can use this as a reference. </em>
Answer:
D. The bank offers you a loan at 4% interest and a savings account that pays 5% interest.
Explanation:
<em>Arbitration</em> is a <em>financial strategy</em> that consists of the price difference between different markets on the same financial asset to obtain an economic benefit, usually without risk.
To perform arbitration, complementary operations (buy and sell) are carried out at the same time and wait for prices to adjust. The arbitration takes advantage of this divergence and obtains a risk-free gain. In other words, the arbitrajista is positioned short (sells) in the market with higher price and long (purchase) in the market with lower price. The benefit would come from the difference between the two markets.
<span>When economists attempt to predict the spending patterns of U.S. households, they will typically view the DAILY COST OF LIVING as a primary determining factor that influences the individual consumption choices that each will make.
An economist can predict the spending power of the masses if he/she knows how much energy and monetary value is being spent on a daily basis. This way he/she will know the consumption choices that these consumers are making for themselves.</span>
