All categories

3 years ago

Pleaseee helppp ASAPP

Mathematics

2 answers:

sveta [45]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

(- 4, 22 )

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine which point lies on the graph, substitute the x- coordinate of the point into the equation and if the value obtained is equal to the y- coordinate of the point then it lies on the graph.

(1, - 2 )

y = - 4(1) + 6 = - 4 + 6 = 2 ≠ - 2 ← not on graph

(- 4, - 10 )

y = - 4(- 4) + 6 = 16 + 6 = 22 ≠ - 10 ← not on graph

(- 4, 22 )

y = - 4(- 4) + 6 = 16 + 6 = 22 ← lies on graph

(1, - 10 )

y = - 4(1) + 6 = - 4 + 6 = 2 ≠ - 10 ← not on graph

Levart [38]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

(-4,22)

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

Find the sum of (3x2 + 16x + 9) and (−16x − 12).

IgorC [24]

3x^2 + 16x + 9 −16x − 12
= 3x^2 - 3

hope it helps

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In 2000, the average GPA for Rutgers College students was 3.15. A sample in 2002 showed that the average GPA for Rutgers College

Vladimir79 [104]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $\mu_{2002}\leq 3.15$

Alternative hypothesis : $\mu_{2002} > 3.15$

C. The mean Rutgers College GPA has increased to more than 3.15

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

$\bar X_{2000}=3.15$ represent the average score for Rutgers College in 2000

$\bar X_{2002}=3.46$ represent the average score for Rutgers College in 2002

$s_{2000}$ represent the sample standard deviation in 2000

$s_{2002}$ represent the sample standard deviation in 2002

$n$ sample size

State the null and alternative hypotheses. .

What are H0 and Ha for this study?

Null hypothesis: $\mu_{2002}\leq 3.15$

Alternative hypothesis : $\mu_{2002} > 3.15$

For this case we need to take in count that the alternative hypothesis can't have and = sign, and based on the information a good hypothesis here would be if the average GPA increased between 2000 and 2002, so based on this the best option for this case would be:

C. The mean Rutgers College GPA has increased to more than 3.15

4 0

3 years ago

HELP ME Randomthing2143! What's the mean of 2, 43, 67, 18?

svetlana [45]

Answer:

32.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Mean = Sum of observations / Total number of observations

Mean = 2+43+67+18 / 4

Mean = 130/4

Mean = 32.5