According to Baumrind (1971), the parent who uses punitive disciplinary measures is authoritarian. Baumrind’s (1971) introduced authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive typologies of parenting styles. The punitive disciplinary measures are considered to be behaviours like punishing children by taking privileges away from a child with little if any explanations or making threats with little or no justification as a way to punish a child. The authoritarian parenting style is characterized by the regular usage of punishment, a very low level of parental warmth and nurturing paired with unresponsiveness and lack of trust. Also, parents have high expectations when it comes to a child's behavior.
Arrow A represents the direction of the electric field vector at the position of the dot.
A dot indicates the location of an electric charge at a certain location. The electric field line will radiate outward in the case of a positive charge. If the charge is negative, the electric field will radiate outward from it. The direction of the electric field at a certain location is not, however, shown by the dot. As a result, reading the values of negative signs on a field line is useless.
As compared to the negative charge, the positive charge, Q, is twice as distant from the dot. We must first measure the intensity of the electric fields in order to determine the electrical field at a certain location. The positive charge is represented by +Q in Figure Q20.5, whereas the negative charge is represented by -1. The intensity of the electric field at a spot represented by a dot must thus be equal to the total of the electric fields pointing in that direction.
Learn more about electrical field, here
brainly.com/question/15800304
#SPJ4
This best illustrates the impact of "context effect ".
A context effect is a part of cognitive psychology that
depicts the impact of natural factors on one's view of a stimulus. The effect
of context effects<span> is thought to be a piece of top down outline.
The idea is upheld by the hypothetical way to deal with observation known as constructive perception.</span>
Explanation:
It is an example of superstitious behavior that is resulting from accidental reinforcement. The accidental reinforcer occurs after an act that may unintentionally strengthen the likelihood of the occurrence of that act. Superstitious behavior is often the result of accidental reinforcement
<u>For example:
</u>
A golfer may be lean as nears the hole. Such learning followed the past by the ball going into the hole (reinforcer) so even though leaning has no causal effects on whether the ball goes in, the accidental contingent relationship between leaning and ball being holed leads to reinforcement of leaning also called adventitious reinforcer.
The protests against the stamp act effective in persuading British merchants to oppose the tax are because the boycotts by the Daughters of Liberty hurt businesses back in Britain.
The act required the colonists to pay a tax, represented by way of a stamp, on diverse kinds of papers, documents, and playing cards. It was an instantaneous tax imposed via the British authorities without the approval of the colonial legislatures and become payable in difficult-to-obtain British sterling, in place of colonial forex.
The Stamp Act of 1765 was an act of the Parliament of high-quality Britain which imposed a direct tax on the British colonies in the united states and required that many revealed substances inside the colonies be produced on stamped paper produced in London, carrying an embossed sales stamp.
On March 22, 1765, British Parliament sooner or later exceeded the Stamp Act or responsibilities in American Colonies Act. It required colonists to pay taxes on each page of printed paper they used. The tax also protected charges for playing cards, dice, and newspapers. The response within the colonies become immediately.
Learn more about the Stamp act here brainly.com/question/17635338
#SPJ4
