Answer:
not make sense as long as Xenophobia had a comparative advantage in any good.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is when a country has a lower cost of production of a good compared to other countries. The country will be able to produce more than it needs and have excess for export.
So if Xenophobia has comparative advantage in for example yam production, and meets its local needs while having excess. It will make no economic sense to waste this excess. Instead it will be better to export the excess and make money for the country.
If i understand your question properly, you want to determine how much each partner wiil have based on the sharing ratio.
Answer:
Alex- $40,000
Brad- $30,000
Carl- $30,000
Explanation:
For a net loss of $100,000 shared between partners in the ratio 4:3:3, the value of each partner's ratio can be calculated as seen below.
Step 1: Add the ratios
i.e; 4 + 3 + 3 = 10
Step 2: Calculate the value of each ratio in $100,000 using te formula
(ratio value ÷ total ratio) × $100,000
For Alex, we have
(4 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.4 × $100,000
= $40,000
For Brad, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
For Carl, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
N.B: To confirm if the value of each ratio is correct, you can add up the values to see if it makes $100,000. If it doesn't, then the calculatio is wrong.
Adding the value of the ratios, we have $40,000 + $30,000 + $30,000 = $100,000.
i hope this helps
Answer:
$142,083
Explanation:
Current asset = Accounts receivable + Cash + Inventory + Marketable securities + Prepaid expenses = 70,256 + 16,928 + 73,062 + 36,421 + 2,512 = $199,179
Current liabilities = Accounts payable + Accrued liabilities + Notes payable (short-term) = 29,317 + 6,298 + 21,481 = $57,096
Working capital = Current assets - Current liabilities = 199,179 - 57,096 = $142,083
Answer:
why do people feel more compelled to work with a leader who demonstrates responsibility?
People feel more compelled to work with a leader who demonstrate responsibility because such leader leads by example as a matter of fact most people are always ready to work without being forced to as a result of act of willingness displayed by such leader
Explanation:
Answer:
Developing nations are concerned with commodity price stabilization because of the following reasons
- There are high price elasticity of supply and demand for many commodities
- Developing economies are often highly dependent on the export of just one or a few commodities.
Explanation:
In recent decades there has been growing concern about the sharp fluctuations of primary product prices, the effects of those fluctuations on particular groups of producers and particular countries, and the measures which might be taken to reduce or offset the fluctuations.
Producing countries have been dominated by proposals for stabilizing world prices of commodities, in particular via the establishment of a “Common Fund” within the framework of UNCTAD's Integrated Program for Commodities.
However, developing nations are concerned with commodity price stabilization because of the two reasons provided above which could result in inflation and deflation.